Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/Usage notes/diff: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Usage notes==== |
====Usage notes==== |
||
* These notes should not take the place of context labels when those are adequate for the job. |
|||
This section, whether identified by a heading or indent level may come anywhere. It should follow as closely as possible after the point that needs explaining. Curb the tendency to be long winded in this section; brief explicit notes tend to be more effective. These notes should not take the place of restrictive labels when those are adequate for the job. Be prepared to document these notes with references. Remember to describe how a term is used, rather than try to dictate how it should be used from your point of view. |
|||
* Describe how a term is used, rather than trying to dictate how it should be used from your point of view. |
|||
* Curb the tendency to be long-winded in this section; brief explicit notes tend to be more effective. |
|||
:''The vote “[[Wiktionary:Votes/2007-10/style for mentioned terms|2007-10/style for mentioned terms]]” is relevant to this section, without specifying text to be amended in this document, so please see it for details.'' |
|||
* When mentioning entries in running text, use the {{temp|m}} template, which italicizes entries written in Latin script. |
|||
* Be prepared to document these notes with references.<ref>[[Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/Usage notes]]</ref> |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||