Wiktionary:Votes/2017-05/Modern Latin as a WDL: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Dan Polansky (talk | contribs) replace "sentence" with "item": it is not a sentence, is it? (really minor) |
Dan Polansky (talk | contribs) remove statement about long-standing practice that is not part of the proposal of the vote, and is potentially controversial |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Modern Latin as a WDL === |
=== Modern Latin as a WDL === |
||
This vote aims to address a long-running confusion about attestation of words used in modern Latin |
This vote aims to address a long-running confusion about attestation of words used in modern Latin. |
||
Voting on: |
Voting on: |
||
Revision as of 20:05, 15 May 2017
Modern Latin as a WDL
This vote aims to address a long-running confusion about attestation of words used in modern Latin.
Voting on:
Adding the following item to Wiktionary:Criteria for inclusion/Well documented languages, in a new line on the list:
9. New Latin and Contemporary Latin (1500-present).
The "and" and punctuation in #7 and 8 will be modified as necessary. Note that this vote is not about whether modern Latin is in fact well documented, but on whether we want to treat it like a constructed language, and have tighter restrictions on what words we accept.
Schedule:
- Vote starts: 00:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
- Vote created: —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC) (new vote wording courtesy of Dan Polansky)
Discussion:
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation of extinct languages 2- Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-05/Attestation of extinct languages
- Talk:birotula
- Talk:Hogvartensis
- Wiktionary:Requests for verification#Dzibutum (to be archived at Talk:Dzibutum)
- Wiktionary talk:Votes/2017-05/Modern Latin as a WDL
