Wiktionary:Requests for verification: difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
m →asearch: cited imo |
m →User:123abc's entries: 2c |
||
| Line 5,201: | Line 5,201: | ||
* [[Alzheimer病]] = <tt><nowiki>{{form of|Non-standard form|阿茲海默病|lang=zh}}</nowiki></tt> |
* [[Alzheimer病]] = <tt><nowiki>{{form of|Non-standard form|阿茲海默病|lang=zh}}</nowiki></tt> |
||
unless some convincing evidence can be provided for why they ought to be regarded as standard. <b><font style="color:darkred">†</font></b> [[﴾]]<sup>(<i>u</i>):</sup>[[User:Doremítzwr|Raifʻhār]] <sup>(<i>t</i>):</sup>[[User talk:Doremítzwr|Doremítzwr]][[﴿]] 12:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
unless some convincing evidence can be provided for why they ought to be regarded as standard. <b><font style="color:darkred">†</font></b> [[﴾]]<sup>(<i>u</i>):</sup>[[User:Doremítzwr|Raifʻhār]] <sup>(<i>t</i>):</sup>[[User talk:Doremítzwr|Doremítzwr]][[﴿]] 12:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
I agree that the idiomatic ones should be kept if there are three citations, that if used in Chinese they're Chinese. I also think that RFVing a bunch of entries without checking for citations, or which the nominator knows there are citations, and hoping no one does the work to cite them, is acting in bad faith. I'm tempted to say "keep all" for that reason, even if they are uncited, and though this is not a vote page. I would cite them myself, but don't know enough Chinese (I known none, actually) to know when they are being used and when mentioned, etc.<span class="Unicode">​—</span>[[User:Msh210|msh210]]<span class="Unicode">℠</span> 17:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== [[biological evolution]] == |
== [[biological evolution]] == |
||