Citations:furversion

English citations of furversion

Noun: "(furry fandom slang) sexual interest in furry media and/or the furry subculture"

						1994 1994 1996	2002 2003
ME «	15th c.	16th c.	17th c.	18th c.	19th c.	20th c.	21st c.

• 1994 April 5, Lycan, “Re: Fox Addiction...”, in alt.fan.furry‎^[1] (Usenet):

  And _if_ furversion is a mental illness, would you want it to be cured? (Personaly,^[sic] I wouldn't, I'm having too much fun in my dreams...)

• 1995 January 17, cop...@teleport.com, “Re: Problems/Furry 2”, in alt.fan.furry‎^[2] (Usenet):

  What? And allow this furversion to flourish without his superior moral in-sight? :)

• 1996 March 12, Marshall Anthony Woods (quoted by Timothy Fay), “KIMBA!!!”, in alt.fan.furry‎^[3] (Usenet):

  While poking through the discount videos rack at Wal-Mart, what should I find but 'Kimba the White Lion'! For you younger Furries, this was a series that played afternoons in the mid 60s. It's one of the things that led to my Furversion, or so I've always believed.

• 1996 March 24, Lontra (quoted by D.M. Quozl Falk), “confessions of a furry toonophile”, in alt.fan.furry‎^[4] (Usenet):

  So, these are the confessions of a furry toonophile. Our furversion may be less graphic and spoogey than others', but vive le difference, non?

• 2002 September 24, no one in particular, “Re: Time to break out the P.J. once again... :)”, in alt.fan.furry‎^[5] (Usenet):

  And I NEVER EVER meant in any way shape or form to give anyone the remotest idea that my mere willful ignorance of their silly passions could be translated into avid agreement. Just because I choose to ignore the furversions of others and not go to war over it does not denote condoning them as a lifestyle, much less being a fellow practitioner.

• 2003 November 9, no one in particular, “Re: FUR: NEXXUS AND FURNATION IS A CORPORATION OF THIEVES”, in alt.fan.furry‎^[6] (Usenet):

  Oh wait, an art brokerage would rely on funds in escrow and contractual requirements when furs already break the laws regarding fraud all the time as it is. Not like any new controls would be followed any more than standing laws or societal taboos like those regarding all the furversions the fandoms rep is already saddled with.