Talk:些事

is 些 daiyoji

so in the entry for 些事, 瑣事 is listed as an alternate form. however, in chinese, 瑣事 is the main form, and 些事 does not exist at all. now, i cannot find any "ancient documents" testifying the existance of 瑣事 or 些事, so if someone finds something like that, that could be considered conclusive evidence. however, my main point is that 瑣 is a hyogai kanji, while 些 is not. the two are homophones, and although 些 works somewhat decently, 瑣 makes more sense, as its main sense is trivial. thus, i believe 些 is daiyoji. if anyone would like to contest this, please feel free to do so. 三河孝達(雝之) (talk) 04:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)