Talk:意向形
Latest comment: 9 months ago by 0DF in topic 意嚮形
意嚮形
[edit]@0DF Are you sure about this? Where is this information from? —Fish bowl (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Fish bowl: 意向 (ikō) lists 意嚮 as a dated alternative spelling. There is one hit for 意嚮形 on Google Books, namely this one ( […] 意嚮形辺に存するや声明文中所謂建設的方当初大臣の電報は之を提出せず片倉大尉保管しありしが廿八日林総領事来訪し之を司令官に語り遂に提出せり。), so I erred on the side of including it, but marked it both dated and rare. If there's some a priori reason it's wrong, however, please feel free to remove it. I'm going out now, but I'll have a look at your RFDs when I get back. 0DF (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- I see; thank you for the explanation. That makes sense. However, the Google Books passage seems to be about governance in Japanese Manchuria (the book is titled 満洲事変 "the Mukden Incident"), so it's probably not relevant, unfortunately. A text search in the National Diet Library produces
各政黨の意嚮形勢は急轉直下して
, but it's actually各政黨の意嚮：形勢は急轉直下して
, and is similarly political. "Verbatim" Google search also doesn't produce anything except for one spammy Chinese e-book "website" that may have been shoved into a Simplified-Traditional conversion program. —Fish bowl (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- I see; thank you for the explanation. That makes sense. However, the Google Books passage seems to be about governance in Japanese Manchuria (the book is titled 満洲事変 "the Mukden Incident"), so it's probably not relevant, unfortunately. A text search in the National Diet Library produces
- @Fish bowl: I think that's plenty to justify taking it out of the entry, so I'll do just that. And yes, I'd seen the Chinese text on Google Web and disregarded it as irrelevant. 0DF (talk) 22:18, 17 October 2023 (UTC)