The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
- In fairness this gets six hits on Google Books, two of which are usable (if you allow Ailihphilia). So I think it merits at the very least a whole month. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. I clicked on Doremítzwr's links, and despite his statement that it satisfies the CFI, I'm not convinced. I did put one of them on the citations-page, though. —RuakhTALK 07:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)