Talk:get to
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Dentonius in topic RFD discussion: November–December 2020
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
SOP. Move the seemingly idiomatic senses to get. Benwing2 (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Largely keep as idiomatic enough. As far as I can see, "get" does not have an obviously extractable substitutable sense in several of these. Even for arguably the least idiomatic sense, "To reach or arrive at ~", get says "for specific idiomatic senses see individual entries get into, get over, etc.", to which we could add "get to". See also get at. Mihia (talk) 02:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep -- Dentonius (my politics | talk) 10:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep at least senses 3 and 4. I'd say 1 is probably SOP, so make that a %lit, and I'm a weak keep for #2. 76.100.241.89
RFD kept — Dentonius 10:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)