Talk:many-partedness
Latest comment: 9 months ago by P. Sovjunk in topic RFD discussion: July–October 2023
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Probably SOP many-partedness Apldeoo (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not necessarily SOP, but manypartedness doesn’t seem to meet CFI. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 17:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Kept, no consensus. Retracted by nominator P. Sovjunk (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)