Talk:thundermug

wouldn't it be an archaic word as the word is still used in contemporary texts like The Obsidian Trilogy which was released in 2002. the word I agree is at least dated and won't likely be understood by many people. but I think archaic would be a better descriptor Tydoni 17:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC) changed obsolete to historical as I believe it is a more accurate description of the word Tydoni 22:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Could someone please explain to me why this keeps getting changed to obsolete? To me calling this obsolete is too strong to describe this term especially when my understanding is this word was used in and around Shakespearean times and most Shakespearean words are listed as archaic and this is used in texts from both 1944 and 2003. Tydoni 02:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)