Template:RQ:Baxter Catholick Theologie
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
1675, Richard Baxter, “[The First Book.] (please specify |part=1 to 3)”, in Richard Baxter’s Catholick Theologie: […], London: […] Robert White, for Nevill Simmons […], →OCLC:
- The following documentation is located at Template:RQ:Baxter Catholick Theologie/documentation. [edit]
- Useful links: subpage list • links • redirects • transclusions • errors (parser/module) • sandbox
Usage
[edit]This template may be used in Wiktionary entries to format quotations from Richard Baxter's work Richard Baxter’s Catholick Theologie (1st edition, 1675). It can be used to create a link to an online version of the work at Google Books (archived at the Internet Archive):
|
(In the Google Books version of the work, the Second Book appears in between parts 2 and 3 of the First Book.)
Parameters
[edit]The template takes the following parameters:
|book=– mandatory in some cases: if quoting from the Second Book, specify|book=2. If this parameter is omitted, the template defaults to the First Book|part=– mandatory in some cases: if quoting from the First Book, specify the part number quoted from in Arabic numerals, from|part=1to Template:part. If this parameter is omitted, the template defaults to the First Part.|1=or|chapter=, or|section=– if a part of the work is divided into numbered chapters or sections, use|1=or|chapter=to specify the chapter number, or|section=to specify the section number, quoted from in uppercase Roman numerals.|chaptername=or|sectionname=– the name of the chapter or section quoted from. If quoting from one of the chapters from the First Book indicated in the second column of the following table, give|chaptername=the value indicated in the first column:
| Parameter value | Result |
|---|---|
| First Part | |
| Preface | The Preface, against Clergie Mens Contentions, and Church Distracting Controversies |
| Scripture | I Intreat the Wrathful, Contentious, Zealous Dogmatists Conscientiously to Study these Texts of Scripture |
| Second Part | |
| Appendix | An Appendix to This Premonition |
| Summary | The Contents of These Theses Cannot Be Well Given You, Without Reciting too Great a Part of Them: But Rather than None, Take This Imperfect Summary Following. |
|para=or|paragraph=– the paragraph number quoted from in Arabic numerals.|2=or|page=, or|pages=– mandatory in some cases: the page number(s) quoted from. If quoting a range of pages, note the following:- Separate the first and last page number of the range with an en dash, like this:
|pages=10–11. - You must also use
|pageref=to indicate the page to be linked to (usually the page on which the Wiktionary entry appears).
- Separate the first and last page number of the range with an en dash, like this:
- This parameter must be specified to have the template determine, in the Second Book, the name of the chapter quoted from, and to link to the online version of the work.
|3=,|text=, or|passage=– the passage to be quoted.|footer=– a comment on the passage quoted.|brackets=– use|brackets=onto surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, "some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell") rather than an actual use of it (for example, "we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset"), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.
Examples
[edit]- Wikitext:
{{RQ:Baxter Catholick Theologie|part=1|section=XVIII|sectionname=A Confutation of Dr. [[w:William Twisse|Twisse]]'s Digr. 5. l. 2. Sect. 1. Vind. Grat|para=588|page=94|passage=This opinion ſeemeth to me, to leave very little or no place for the Chriſtian Religion. For {{...}} It '''obliterateth''' the notion of Gods Holineſs, vvhich to be no Holineſs, but a common or indifferent thing.}} - Result:
- 1675, Richard Baxter, “[The First Book.] The First Part: […]. Section XVIII. A Confutation of Dr. Twisse’s Digr. 5. l. 2. Sect. 1. Vind. Grat.”, in Richard Baxter’s Catholick Theologie: […], London: […] Robert White, for Nevill Simmons […], →OCLC, paragraph 588, page 94:
- This opinion ſeemeth to me, to leave very little or no place for the Chriſtian Religion. For […] It obliterateth the notion of Gods Holineſs, vvhich to be no Holineſs, but a common or indifferent thing.
| |||||