Template:RQ:Jones Stone-heng

a. 1653 (date written), Inigo Jones, The Most Notable Antiquity of Great Britain, Vulgarly Called Stone-heng on Salisbury Plain. […], London: […] James Flesher for Daniel Pakeman […], and Laurence Chapman […], published 1655, →OCLC:

---

The following documentation is located at Template:RQ:Jones Stone-heng/documentation. ^[edit]

Useful links: subpage list • links • redirects • transclusions • errors (parser/module) • sandbox

Usage

This template may be used on Wiktionary entry pages to quote Inigo Jones's work The Most Notable Antiquity of Great Britain, Vulgarly Called Stone-heng on Salisbury Plain (1st edition, 1655). It can be used to create a link to an online version of the work at the Internet Archive.

Parameters

The template takes the following parameters:

• |chapter= – if quoting from the preface entitled "To the Favourers of Antiquity" by John Webb, specify |chapter=Preface.
• |1= or |page=, or |pages= – mandatory in some cases: the page number(s) quoted from. When quoting a range of pages, note the following:
  • Separate the first and last pages of the range with an en dash, like this: |pages=10–11.
  • You must also use |pageref= to indicate the page to be linked to (usually the page on which the Wiktionary entry appears).

This parameter must be specified to have the template link to the online version of the work.

• |2=, |text=, or |passage= – the passage to be quoted.
• |footer= – a comment on the passage quoted.
• |brackets= – use |brackets=on to surround a quotation with brackets. This indicates that the quotation either contains a mere mention of a term (for example, “some people find the word manoeuvre hard to spell”) rather than an actual use of it (for example, “we need to manoeuvre carefully to avoid causing upset”), or does not provide an actual instance of a term but provides information about related terms.

Examples

• Wikitext:
  • {{RQ:Jones Stone-heng|page=96|passage='Tis true, if ''Mythologie'', and not demonſtrative reaſons vvere to be fixt upon in matters of ''Architecture'', the former conceptions might be ſome ground to frame conjectures ''Stoneheng'' ſacred to ''[[w:Pan (god)|Pan]]''. But, ''Architecture'' depending upon demonſtration, not fancy, the fictions of ''Mythologiſts'' are no further to be embraced, then as not impertinently '''conducing''' to prove reall truths.}}; or
  • {{RQ:Jones Stone-heng|96|'Tis true, if ''Mythologie'', and not demonſtrative reaſons vvere to be fixt upon in matters of ''Architecture'', the former conceptions might be ſome ground to frame conjectures ''Stoneheng'' ſacred to ''[[w:Pan (god)|Pan]]''. But, ''Architecture'' depending upon demonſtration, not fancy, the fictions of ''Mythologiſts'' are no further to be embraced, then as not impertinently '''conducing''' to prove reall truths.}}
• Result:
  • a. 1653 (date written), Inigo Jones, The Most Notable Antiquity of Great Britain, Vulgarly Called Stone-heng on Salisbury Plain. […], London: […] James Flesher for Daniel Pakeman […], and Laurence Chapman […], published 1655, →OCLC, page 96:

    'Tis true, if Mythologie, and not demonſtrative reaſons vvere to be fixt upon in matters of Architecture, the former conceptions might be ſome ground to frame conjectures Stoneheng ſacred to Pan. But, Architecture depending upon demonſtration, not fancy, the fictions of Mythologiſts are no further to be embraced, then as not impertinently conducing to prove reall truths.