Template talk:None
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Daniel. in topic Template:None
Deletion debate[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
All it does is print the first parameter. Why is this template needed? -- Prince Kassad 14:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- Seems to be to combat the auto-script effects of
{{Xyzy}}(which itself should probably be deleted). I understand the logic - problem is, the default script settings are the same as for{{Latn}}anyway, which is why [[house#English|house]] and {{l|en|house}} are exactly equivalent. So in the cases where it is used, it should just use sc=Latn (unless someone can find a counter-argument). Mglovesfun (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)- I agree,
{{Xyzy}}is one of those experiments by Ullmann which have more negative effects than positive ones. -- Prince Kassad 22:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)- Keep as it has been modified since this discussion started. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree,
Kept: Consensus indicates that we should have Template:None as long as we have Template:Xyzy. (In addition, let me remind that Template:list:days of the week/ar uses {{None}} to avoid using {{Arab}} twice for the same text, which would make the text much bigger than it should, which is an additional reason to keep the template in question.) --Daniel. 14:07, 21 May 2011 (UTC)