Template talk:scn-adj-h

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

I'd rather have these in the inflection line as a {{scn-adj}}. For other languages with four forms, such as more-or-less all of the Romance languages we put these in the inflection line. Note, just realized scn-adj alreadu exists, will now look at it. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

{{scn-adj}} now seems sufficient as I've made it more flexible but with the same default values; {{scn-adj-n}}, the n seems to be for 'normal' and {{scn-adj}} already covers it; {{scn-adj-h}} is for variants which use -hi for the plural instead of just -i. That said, none of the three templates, for some reason, doesn't allow the masculine and feminine plurals to be different to each other. Is that because no such adjective exists? Hopefully, but I doubt it. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

• Kept for no consensus or discussion. --ElisaVan (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)