"Bad faith"

Re: first paragraph: I'm not sure if I can name fifty, but ten is easy. There are, funnily enough, exactly fifty oppose voters at Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian; that doesn't count as fifty people who have a problem with how Ivan does things, first because not all the oppose voters do, and secondly because quite a few of those oppose voters are not actually part of the community, but ten? Fugetaboutit.

Re: second paragraph: Calling someone an asshole is not using an argumentum ad hominem. Saying that we operate by consensus is not using an argumentum ad populi.

Re: third paragraph: I'm not sure what you think this conversation is about, because you clearly are not participating in it.

If naming ten people who share your opinion on Ivan Štambuk is easy, please do so.

It is an argumentum ad hominem, because you attacked the person, not what he said. At this moment //en.wiktionary.org doesn't operate by consensus, it operates by blocking dissent.

Well, your sock/meat/IRC puppet User:Haplology made sure, I didn't participate for 3 days. Congratulations.