Strong non-lemma forms
Strong non-lemma forms need their own etymological information. E.g. Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/dedǭ has a unique derivation from a reduplicated form. There is no reason to have this information only in the pages for the lemma forms, which is confusing and overly inaccessible.
With all respect,
128.84.127.223 15:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
It's not unique, it's shared by all past-tense forms. The practice on Wiktionary is to include the etymology for all forms on the lemma entry. In fact, non-lemma entries are kept as minimal as possible.
This practice doesn't seem to be the best approach for arbitrary, memorized strong forms like these. It is understandable for forms like "walked" to leave the etymology to "walk", but in the cases of forms like "brought", "did", "sang", where the etymology of the particular form can be independently traced back to earlier forms, this information should be more readily accessible from and noted in the non-lemma form's page.