about "Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰeyd-"

according to "Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb" PP: 2 - 3; these Iranian words and verbs are from this root: •AVESTAN: YAv. astō.biδ- ‘who breaks a bone’ (V 4.37, V 4.39) Liste: 38 •MIDDLE PERSIAN: (+ *pari-) MMP frbys- (inch.) ‘to be afflicted, suffer’ (Sundermann 1985: 291, fn. 19) DMMPP: 277b Inch./Pass.: pres. SUBJ. 3pl. MMP frbys’nd •NEIR: ◊ On Wax. zübüt- ‘to break’. Ariamihr (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

The probably are from that root, but you added them under *bʰéyd, which is not a word in Proto-Indo-European.

so how can i write ? Ariamihr (talk) 16:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

What PIE formation does the verb come from?

i don't know, because they are thematic forms (Avestan (biδ-) and Sanskrit (bhed-) and Middle Saka (bid) ) but i couldn't find similar forms from another indo-european languages

We also show forms that cannot be reconstructed for other languages. In that case, the term is not linked, so only the third parameter of {{l}} is used and not the second. Sometimes, further descendants of such a form are found later, and when there are enough, we make them into proper PIE words.

So, if I understand correctly, they are descendants of a hypothetical *bʰéyd-e-ti?

ok, we can add them under *bʰéyd-e-ti