User talk:Gesælig Æsc
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Renard Migrant in topic abolir
I've moved your nomination to WT:RFDO#Template:es-conj-ir (abolir) as that's what you've actually nominated. Try using <br> at the end of lines to use line breaks and make the conjugations readable. Frankly, I still don't understand your nomination. Renard Migrant (talk) 11:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Are you making a case for deletion or just having fun with writing out hypothetical conjugations? Because it sure as Hell looks like the second one to me. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- There is no "real" consensus on this verb's paradigm, most people don't know this verb is no longer defective. I am merely hypothesising all possible conjugational paradigms and trying to argue about how this one is best among all possibilities. For reasons of unambiguity and euphony. Anyone trying to conjugate the verb will choose any of the five possibilities. I myself have only heard people leaning towards the FIRST one, the RAE has decided that the verb should be assigned a regular paradigm represented in the FOURTH one. I my self lean towards the SECOND and THIRD with a euphonic weakening of the tonic vowel "o" in the likes of the verb "podrir" (to rot).