User talk:Nahum Reduta

I'm confused. Your "reformating" is putting the pages in a format completely alien to this project, and is deleting lots of content without comment at the same time. --EncycloPetey 00:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm using standard wiki formatting. Any deleted content is redundant or implicitly understood. (i.e. "slang for", "a term meaning", unnecessary phrases in a list of slang terms).

While you are using standard formatting options, that's not necessarily the same as standard formatting among the thousands of other pages in the English Wiktionary. Granted, our Appendices are few, sporadic, and not well-maintained. But, wouldn't it be worth considering a common format with the rest of Wiktionary, to ensure that future editors aren't baffled? --EncycloPetey 00:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Just being bold. Besides, the format I'm complying with is used by the similar Appendix:Military slang. I've made similar changes in the past on Wikipedia pages without incident. Please don't edit war with me.

This isn't an edit war, and this isn't Wikipedia. What happens on Wikipedia has little relevance here, as we are a separate project with different style, methods, and goals. Now, the fact that this tyle is being implemented across multiple Appendices is a good thing. --EncycloPetey 01:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC)