Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2008-09/Whitelisted users autopatrol
Mind if I edit this to be specific about the details?
- enable group "autopatrol"
- enable group "patrol"
- enable sysop access to UserRights
- restrict sysop use of UserRights to add/remove group "patrol", add/remove group "autopatrol"
Do we want "rollback"? Group gives users the "rollback" link when looking at a diff. This is a useful combination with "patrol".
Even if we don't want to use group "patrol", we can ask for it and then decide? Or decide now? I would rather not ask for "autopatrol" now and go back and ask for "patrol" in a little while. Robert Ullmann 17:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me (the rewording). And since we're not actually adding anyone to "patrol" or "rollback", there's little harm in adding "rollback".—msh210℠ 18:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
this is a configuration request
it is not some flakey enhancement
specifically, it is changing the local variables for the en.wikt thusly:
/** * This will add the patrol group **/ $wgGroupPermissions['patrol']['patrol'] = true; $wgGroupPermissions['patrol']['rollback'] = true; $wgGroupPermissions['patrol']['autopatrol'] = true; /** * This will add the autopatrol group **/ $wgGroupPermissions['autopatrol']['autopatrol'] = true; /** * This will give sysops access to the Special:Userrights page **/ $wgGroupPermissions['sysop']['userrights'] = true; /** * This will restrict sysops to add/remove only the specified groups in the Special:Userrights page **/ $wgAddGroups['sysop'] = array( 'patrol', 'autopatrol' ); $wgRemoveGroups['sysop'] = array( 'patrol', 'autopatrol' );
These are standard core MW groups, just like "sysop", "autoconfirmed", "bot", etc. (note that "patrol" grants "rollback" and "autopatrol", we don't have a separate grant of "rollback" this way, but we could.) Robert Ullmann 11:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)