Euclid's lemma

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

English[edit]

English Wikipedia has an article on:
Wikipedia

Alternative forms[edit]

Etymology[edit]

Named after ancient Greek mathematician Euclid of Alexandria (fl. 300 BCE). A version of the proposition appears in Book VII of his Elements.

Noun[edit]

Euclid's lemma (uncountable)

  1. (number theory) The proposition that if a prime number p divides an arbitrary product ab of integers, then p divides a or b or both;
    slightly more generally, the proposition that for integers a, b, c, if a divides bc and gcd(a, b) = 1, then a divides c;
    (algebra, by generalisation) the proposition that for elements a, b, c of a given principal ideal domain, if a divides bc and gcd(a, b) = 1, then a divides c.
    • 1998, Peter M. Higgins, Mathematics for the Curious, Oxford University Press, page 78:
      I used Euclid's Lemma in a slightly sly way in the second chapter, where I ran through the argument that is irrational. I said there that if is a factor of then itself must be even. This follows from Euclid's Lemma upon taking , the only even prime, and taking . Indeed, using Euclid's Lemma it is not hard to generalize the argument showing to be irrational to prove that is irrational for any prime .
    • 2007, David M. Burton, The History of Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, page 179:
      If and are not relatively prime, then the conclusion of Euclid's lemma may fail to hold. A specific example: , but and .
    • 2008, Martin Erickson, Anthony Vazzana, Introduction to Number Theory[1], Taylor & Francis (Chapman & Hall / CRC Press), page 42:
      In our discussion of Euclid's lemma (Corollary 2.18), we noted that the uniqueness of factorization of integers is a fact that we often take for granted given the way it is introduced in school.

Usage notes[edit]

The proposition as generalised to principal ideal domains is occasionally called Gauss's lemma; some writers, however, consider this usage erroneous as another result is known by that term.

Further reading[edit]