Talk:Иль-де-Франс

@KoreanQuoter Hello. I think proper nouns don't need all these listings of other place names in "see also's", even if they have something in common. Besides, it's error-prone. Incorrect transliterations need to be fixed in all places.

Also, {{wikipedia}} doesn't need a parameter if the page name matches the link name, {{wikipedia|lang=ru}}, not {{wikipedia|Ивелин|lang=ru}}, if the page name is "Ивелин". They get into a hidden category Category:wikipedia with redundant first parameter. (All editors need to see hidden categories.).

A standard apostrophe ' should be used in Wiktionary, even if Wikipedia uses ’, for example in French entries or translations - Val-d’Oise, Валь-д’Уа́з (Valʹ-d’Uáz) --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 13:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@AtitarevAs for adding the "See also" section, this is my editing philosophy: trying to make entries more user-friendly with more info. But I really do dedicate a lot on one topic or entry. And the most of all, I feel more confused that I'm doing more harm than good or something along this line. --KoreanQuoter (talk) 13:49, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@KoreanQuoter I am not saying you're doing harm but how does adding other place names make those entries more user-friendly?--Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 23:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

@Atitarev I will say that improving the "see also" and "related terms" sections is really making entries more user-friendly. --KoreanQuoter (talk) 13:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)