Talk:國際機場

RFD discussion: October 2016–March 2017

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

國際機場

SoP --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 01:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

国际机场

SoP --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 01:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

• Comment. If we do end up deleting this, we should add a sense to international that can indicate the meaning of the term in international airport and international flight. ---> Tooironic (talk) 04:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry Anatoli, I'm voting for keep for these terms, at least the Chinese words. They are high-importance words and would give much benefit to new learners and travellers. The Chinese term is also found in Ministry of Education's dictionary. Wyang (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

That's fine, no need to apologize. We don't have to agree on everything. ;) --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 12:23, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

I couldn't find the term in other common dictionaries. Perhaps we should define a list of Chinese dictionaries, which should be used as a guide for inclusion. It would make the process of RFD simpler for "pro-keep" voters. E.g. if a term is included in that dictionary, we can keep it. I support Lemming_test approach in handling RFD's and it would be especially useful for languages with scriptio continua. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

No consensus for deletion. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)