The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, though feel free to discuss its conclusions.
go postal, go crazy. Go + adjective structure wouldn't seem to warrant an entry. Looking up the adjective should get users what they want. DCDuring 18:34, 29 December 2008 (UTC) Holiday Greetings!
think I agree with you. I immediately thought of go ape (where ape, unlike apeshit, is not used without go) — but, according to our entry at , it can be used that way ("we were ape" in an example sentence, albeit a fabricated one). In any case, if this goes, ape should go as well. go ape Equinox 21:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure I agree with myself on this either. There is currently a discussion about
off the deep end/ go off the deep end (TR?). I'm thinking that "go" + new adjective/sense leads to free-standing new adjective sense, leads to gradable/comparable adjective sense, but that the "go" form may remain very common, possibly overwhelmingly so (" go ballistic", " go postal", go/get medieval). DCDuring 21:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC) Holiday Greetings!
Keep. To use DC's word, I think this form is "overwhelmingly" common. -- WikiPedant 04:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
kept no consenus-- Rising Sun 17:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)