Talk:lucrabilitate

RFV

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

"Lucrabilitate" isn't a commonly accepted term in Romanian! It does not exist in DEX and even if the word circulates on the web, it just doesn't convey any real meaning. The correct Romanian equivalent for "workability" is practicabilitate. The same critique can be applied to lucrabil (the correct term in Romanian is practicabil; lucrabil is an absurd construction). Just because suffixes can be added, doesn't imply that they should! --Robbie SWE 19:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The question isn't whether the suffix should be added, it's whether it is added. google scholar:"lucrabilitate" suggests that it's appeared in the Revista de Chimie and the Revista Romana de Materiale, and google books:"lucrabilitate" suggests that it's appeared in a few other periodicals as well. That said, if you're confident that this term is nonstandard, you can tag it as such by adding {{nonstandard|lang=ro}} to the start of the definition. —Ruakh_TALK 20:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Verdict: we'll keep this, because it is used, but tag it as nonstandard. - -sche (discuss) 22:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)