Talk:messaggio di posta elettronica
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mglovesfun
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Not in the slightest idiomatic. If you know what email and messaggio means, you can realise that it's an email message (deleted English entry). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- algudstuf4learners(lots ofwords/day uno..) w/readers[asme4chin+cedict/mdbg >pl c dalite,vote4cfi-expansion..[sop,pr.nouns
- ps[2mglovs: more oldfrench'dbe cooltho/j'aime bien,moi[d'uno how2saydad i/o.f. btw?]!!:P--史凡>voice-MSN/skypeme!RSI>typin=hard! 15:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. To me it does not mean "email message", it just means email. They like to be more precise in Italian than we do in English, where a simple email can be any part of speech and have concrete and abstract senses. —Stephen 16:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Italian isn't the only language that does this. E-mail in a lot of other languages doesn't mean "a piece of e-mail", it means to the "system for transferring messages from one computer to another". We wouldn't say "an e-mail message" in English, but it's exactly what they would say a lot of the time. — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete messaggio di posta elettronica as pure SoP. If email in Italian only refers to the system sense the entry there needs a gloss to indicate that. Either keep messaggio e-mail and messaggio email or delete if an adjective sense for (deprecated template usage) email could be appropriately added to the Italian entry. — Carolina wren discussió 17:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep messaggio di posta elettronica as well. The word email is a very recent loan in Italian (as it is in many other languages) and messaggio di posta elettronica is the proper term for it. —Stephen 19:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I should point out, people can comment on these separately above if they wish. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Kept all, 2 months of no consensus. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)