Talk:miroblita

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFV discussion: March–July 2020
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: January–March 2020 (Spanish)

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


DTLHS (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


More sources

[edit]

@Metaknowledge, I believe the verification criteria for the removal of the tag have been met now. Could you please check? Leefeni de Karik (talk) 00:13, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Leefeni de Karik: The tag is removed when the discussion linked there is closed. In any case, your second quote looks like a mention rather than a use (see use–mention distinction), and I'm not sure any of the three are from durably archived sources (things that have been physically published or can't be removed from the Web like a normal website can). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge The first one is an actually published book (its second page has every criteria required for books published in Brazil), the second one is in one of the world's largest Catholic media platforms (Aleteia) and the third one is an official report by the Brazilian archdiocesis of the Polish Autocephalous Orthodox Church (although unfortunately I can't demonstrate durability). Does Web Archive count? Leefeni de Karik (talk) 04:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Leefeni de Karik: No. It sounds like the first and third are good, but the size of a media platform is irrelevant to its ability to take down content. Have you tried Google Books? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge I see, thank you, I'll look further. Leefeni de Karik (talk) 04:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: March–July 2020

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


miroblita (Portuguese)

The Spanish already failed RFV, but somehow the Portuguese got overlooked. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

See the ongoing discussion at Talk:miroblita. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)Reply