Talk:numbery

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 8 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: April–July 2015
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: April–July 2015[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


"Melodious". Not sure what that has to do with numbers. Equinox 22:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

One can find it all over the place in older dictionaries and encyclopedias, but they all cite just one source: w:Josuah Sylvester, either as author, or translator. Here's possibly the most-cited passage: [1]. He also seems to be the source cited for most or all of the references in the same sources for another sense, meaning numerous. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think it has to do with number in the sense of a musical tune/musical number/song Leasnam (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
I thought about that, but how far back does that sense of number go? Joshua Sylvester died in 1618. Besides, he was well known for adding tons of ornate, meaningless embellishments to the simplest of sentences- this looks like a nonce term to me. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 19:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)Reply