Talk:play pocket pool

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: September–December 2014
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: September–December 2014

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This term meaning "masturbate" was deleted before as sum of parts, but it does not seem sum of parts to me. We do have pocket pool as "masturbation", but that does not make "play pocket pool" seem sum of parts to me. --Dan Polansky (talk) 19:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's true that you have to understand it in the sense of the game, as well as in the figurative sense of masturbation, e.g. the word "game" in this example from Google Books: "Even the trace of moisture from his lips struck me as erotic, and I had to play a quick game of pocket pool to avoid public embarrassment." I'm not sure how we can document that comprehensively; it is probably best done with notes in the entry, rather than creating all such forms. Equinox 19:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
BTW, is this only used for male masturbation? I'd assume so, because pocket pool suggests balls moving around! Equinox 20:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I know someone who called it pocket billiard juggling. Renard Migrant (talk) 20:41, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
TMI, Renard. Anywho, redirect to pocket pool. Purplebackpack89 15:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Redirected: There's not a single "keep" or "delete" vote here, and nobody's discussed this in more than 2 months. The only action supported by the participants in this discussion seems to be redirect. Purplebackpack89 17:50, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
    My error in stance indication: I actually prefer full keep rather than a redirect, especially since this does not seem to be a sum of parts term. Full keeping enables entry of synonyms. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply