Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion. See also Wiktionary:Previously deleted entries.
All I can find on b.g.c is scannos of verſetzen, i.e. versetzen with a long s. The definitions supplied belong to zerfetzen, to which this entry can be moved if it fails RFV. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Never heard about verfetzen. And all I can find on google seem to be erroneous OCR of versetzen or typos of zerfetzen, IMHO. However as the definitions certainly fit zerfetzen I cannot exclude that it's some rare regional synonyms of zerfetzen. Matthias Buchmeier (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I find it unlikely, given that the entry was originally created by a native French speaker with German on level 2, without a strong history of editing in German. --Hekaheka (talk) 17:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I agree it looks like a typo for zerfetzen. Perhaps we should just move the page to there. --WikiTiki89 18:11, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and moved it to zerfetzen. If it turns out to exist as a rare, obsolete, dialectal, or otherwise uncomfortable word, it can always be re-created (with cites). —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)