Template talk:fr-adverb

Usefulness?

The eagle-eyed among you will have realized that this doesn't do anything that {{infl|fr|adverb}} wouldn't do. It has head and sot parameters, both of which infl also has. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Typing {{fr-adv}} is rather significantly more simple than typing {{infl|fr|adverb}}. There's no real reason for this template to not exist, as {{infl}} was never designed to handle everything. — [ R·I·C ] Laurent — 14:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: July 2014–June 2015

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Template:fr-adv

This has now (and indeed long ago) been surpassed by {{head}}. I would change all instances to {{head|fr|adverb}}, fr-adv does nothing that head doesn't already do better. Renard Migrant (talk) 14:18, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

• Redirect: If two templates do the same thing and both are used in articles, one should be redirected to the other and neither should be deleted. Purplebackpack89 03:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
• Delete, a redirect wouldn't work. —CodeCat 13:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 20:07, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
• Keep {{fr-adv}} simply calls {{head|fr|adverb}} - basically, it already is a redirect. I don't see what significant benefit is gained from deleting a widely used template (something like 3000 transclusions) to replace it with something identical but slightly harder to type. Smurrayinchester (talk) 13:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

• Kept to keep my own life easier. --Type56op9 (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)