Template talk:nl-misspelling

Deletion debate

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

A point of view pushing tool. We already have {{misspelling of}}. Very strong delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphan & Delete. --Bequw → τ 02:37, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems to have already been orphaned, I hope it was replaced by a usage note to the same effect. While the template should not exist in its current form, I would not object to it being rewritten as a line of text to put into Usage notes. We should not arrogantly ignore standards, though we should not rely solely on them either. Conrad.Irwin 00:07, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

That's not a bad idea. Maybe {{misspelling of}} should contain a link to Wiktionary:Misspellings. Although that doesn't exist yet, I think it probably should using the 'draft policy' (or daft policy??) template. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I really hate those 2-0 deletion decisions, could someone else comment? Or else I will delete it (at some point). Mglovesfun (talk) 11:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Delete. I see no point in it being kept. Cdhaptomos talk–contribs 18:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2010 (UTC)