Simplified romanisation approach for Gothic, what is your opinion?

Please check this version of "afdrausjan", which uses Template:got-romanization, which uses the same approach as Template:ja-romaji - the definition line is generated by the template and can only provide a link to the main entry. Is it one to one in Gothic, i.e. can one romanisation have more than one main entry, if not, how many would be sufficient? We have given 6 in Japanese.

I don't think you should discuss that with me, because it seems like a very fundamental change to WT:ELE that needs a lot of discussion and consensus. Aside from that, some bots like AutoFormat assume that definition lines begin with #, and expect there to be a headword, so they would break with such a change.

The generated definition line has # at the beginning of the line, so it doesn't get picked up as fundamentally different by KassadBot (AutoFormat). That's the case with Category:Japanese romaji. The vote on Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-03/Japanese Romaji romanization - format and content is on.