User talk:Julle

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Leo Laursen – (talk · contribs) 15:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Død

Hi Julle, in død (this edit) you deleted the German word from the etymology, with the comment "see [1]. The relevant text: "æda. døth, oldn. (sj.) dauðr, eng. death, ty. tod, got. dauþus; jf. dø, II. død", doesn't really explain your edit. The matter is also complicated by the fact that the etymology seems to be for both the noun and the adjective. ODS has this for the adjective: "glda. dødh(er), æda. døth, run. dåuðr, dǿðr, oldn. dauðr, eng. dead, ty. tot, got. dauþs; egl. part. adj. til dø". It would seem to me, that it doesn't say the origin is Old Norse.

The more modern Danish dictionary DDO has:

• noun: oldnordisk dauðr, tysk Tod – afledt af roden i dø
• adj.: oldnordisk dauðr, tysk tot – oprindelig præteritum participium passiv af verbet dø

I guess they are meant as cognates rather than dual origin.

My etymology book has Proto_Germanic as origin (noun: *dauþu; adj.: *dauþa, dauða.) Maybe *dauþuz, *daudaz, but those pages also assumes Old Norse origin, as opposed to my understanding of the dictionaries.--Leo Laursen – (talk · contribs) 15:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)