braker: Revision history

19 August 2024

• curprev 00:1100:11, 19 August 2024‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 658 bytes +6‎ add missing From in English etyms, remove stray spaces and L2R markers (manually assisted) undo

2 June 2024

• curprev 11:3611:36, 2 June 2024‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 652 bytes −6‎ replace <* {{audio|en|LL-Q1860 (eng)-Vealhurl-breaker.wav|Audio (Southern England)}}> with <* {{audio|en|LL-Q1860 (eng)-Vealhurl-breaker.wav|a=Southern England}}> (clean up audio captions) undo

28 May 2024

• curprev 08:3108:31, 28 May 2024‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 658 bytes −7‎ incorporate a=US into {{enPR}} undo

22 May 2024

• curprev 05:5905:59, 22 May 2024‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 665 bytes −1‎ incorporate a=UK into {{IPA|en}}; infer 1=en for {{a}} based on section it's in undo

16 May 2024

• curprev 14:2614:26, 16 May 2024‎ KovachevBot talk contribs‎ 666 bytes +57‎ Added anagrams (barker, Barker) undo

4 July 2023

• curprev 12:3612:36, 4 July 2023‎ WingerBot talk contribs‎ m 609 bytes +14‎ use 'Audio (Southern England)' for Vealhurl = Wonderfool audios (manually assisted) undo

22 April 2023

• curprev 19:1119:11, 22 April 2023‎ AutoDooz talk contribs‎ m 595 bytes +27‎ →‎English:Noun: converted bare quote to template undo

20 February 2023

• curprev 17:3817:38, 20 February 2023‎ Al-Muqanna talk contribs‎ m 568 bytes +15‎ →‎Etymology: id -er undo

28 November 2022

• curprev 01:4301:43, 28 November 2022‎ AutoDooz talk contribs‎ 553 bytes −2‎ →‎English:Etymology: promoted all child sections to siblings undo

5 May 2022

• curprev 14:2714:27, 5 May 2022‎ Equinox talk contribs‎ 555 bytes +555‎ Created page with "{{also|bräker|Braker}} ==English== ===Etymology=== {{suf|en|brake|er}} ====Pronunciation==== * {{a|UK}} {{IPA|en|/ˈbɹeɪkə/}} * {{audio|en|LL-Q1860 (eng)-Vealhurl-breaker.wav|Audio (UK)}} * {{a|US}} {{enPR|brāʹkər}}, {{IPA|en|/ˈbɹeɪkɚ/}} * {{rhymes|en|eɪkə(ɹ)|s=2}} ===Noun=== {{en-noun}} # One who brakes. #* '''2017''', Ross Bentley, ''The Lost Art of High Performance Driving'' (page 58) #*: The answer can best be summed up with this statement: a good r..."