User talk:Equinox

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I found a custom text inserter extension for Google Chrome, called Auto Text Expander for Google Chrome™[edit]

Hello. I read on User:Equinox/How_to_be_fast under the Custom text insertion section that you haven't found an extension for Google Chrome that does what you used to have on Opera: automatically inserting custom text as you have set, using special keys as you have set. The extension I have found is called Auto Text Expander for Google Chrome™. I've installed it, set some "shortcuts" as they call it, tried them on the source editor on Wiktionary and it works for me; my text is automatically replaced as I had set. I hope it works for you. --Bismabrj (talk | contribs) 10:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


You might want to use Template:quote-book more - it's cool Br00pVain (talk) 10:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is good but there is no easy copy-paste-template pipeline. Yet. Equinox 17:46, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Now there is: Wiktionary:Grease_pit/2022/January#Google_Books_quotation_template_generator. 07:49, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Might try it some day. Installing TamperMonkey and whatever is a boring hassle frankly, and nothing ever works. I'm more likely to code up my own desktop monster, but don't count on it. Equinox 03:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey it actually does work and I really find it convenient and useful. And installing Tampermonkey is no big deal honestly, unless you don't want too… :D —Svārtava [tcur] 13:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Why is this not a valid word to include in Wiktionary? It's an actual term in the medical field. 2602:306:CEC2:A3A0:A07C:91F6:D2CC:EC3A 19:34, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any examples of it being used (not merely mentioned) in durably archived media (books, newspapers, journals)? When you do, you could put them on Citations:hepaticocholangiocholecystenterostomy. When there are three with the same meaning, I'd be happy to add the entry or help you add it. DCDuring (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I'm not bothered either way about whether or not you should include "or thought to"; if you consider that weasel words then just cut it. But all the verbiage which ties this definition to lexicographical matters of "man" and "woman", or access to "spaces", is IMO a distraction. To say that these beliefs exclude trans people is simpler and broader. And why cut the "loosely" definition? The word is used extensively online of people who are clearly not thought to be feminists (let alone radical ones) at all. Ƿidsiþ 12:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Widsith: See the talk page. There are two senses, I suppose: the actual "radical feminist" who might be an old-skool lesbian and dislikes "AMAB" in her spaces; and the modern slur that merely means "transphobe". I explained in my edit summary why your edit was not an improvement. But split into two senses if necessary; I think it might be. Try to stay neutral. Equinox 13:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I'm not so sure the two senses are easily distinguishable in practice, which is why I prefer to keep them on the same line. But I'll just stay out of it; trying to improve this page is far too much effort. Ƿidsiþ 13:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tell me about it. I know who will take control, lol. Equinox 14:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]