I inadvertently participated in a quasi edit war, which you and I are involved in, at welp. Your comment says "If you think this rollback is in error, please leave a message on my talk page." I think the rollback was an error, but please enlighten me otherwise. User:I'm so meta even this acronym added a "See also" hatnote, which was a dead link. The dead link leaves no explanation to the user, hence I deemed it unworthy of inclusion.
Relevant edit history at welp:
- (cur | prev) 10:41, 24 June 2015 Makkachin (Talk | contribs) . . (855 bytes) (-14) . . (del dead link) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 15:06, 16 January 2015 Equinox (Talk | contribs) m . . (869 bytes) (+14) . . (Reverted edits by 22.214.171.124. If you think this rollback is in error, please leave a message on my talk page.) (undo | thank)
(cur | prev) 08:14, 16 January 2015 126.96.36.199 (Talk) . . (855 bytes) (-14) . . (deleting “see also” for an entry that does not exist) (undo)
(cur | prev) 18:50, 1 July 2014 I'm so meta even this acronym (Talk | contribs) . . (869 bytes) (+14) . . (undo | thank)
- Red links are useful because they signpost content that we are missing, and give us clues about what still needs to be added. Someone can click the link and create the entry. In this case, though, I can't see that "WELP" is anything other than a radio station name, so perhaps it shouldn't be there. Equinox ◑ 12:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)