Category talk:Terms derived from North Caucasian languages
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Vahagn Petrosyan in topic Deletion debate
Deletion debate[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Category:Terms derived from North Caucasian languages[edit]
This, however, is neither a family nor useful as a generic category, so delete -- Liliana • 21:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- But Ethnologue considers it a family. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ethnologue also considers Australian a family. Using it as a source for linguistics related debates is silly. -- Liliana • 22:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ethnologue keeps disappointing me again and again. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 22:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Deleted. --Vahag (talk) 19:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ethnologue keeps disappointing me again and again. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 22:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ethnologue also considers Australian a family. Using it as a source for linguistics related debates is silly. -- Liliana • 22:06, 27 May 2012 (UTC)