User talk:Vahagn Petrosyan

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wiktionary:Requested entries (Armenian)[edit]

Thanks for being so quick at answering my requests there. Also, sorry for the bogus words: as I don't speak any Armenian, I generally use Google Translate, or go to a Wikipedia article and look for its Armenian equivalent (as I did for Սրբանային սեքս). Since Category:Requests for translations into Armenian is a bit cluttered and unwieldy, I prefer not to use it. --Barytonesis (talk) 14:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Sure. I'll try to cleanup Category:Requests for translations into Armenian. --Vahag (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
I use Google translate to get a (very) rough idea of the meaning of texts in other languages: in other words I only translate into a language I know. I can see how it might be useful to provide leads for candidates in other languages to check by other means, but I would never trust the raw output as a source in its own right. The problem is that it uses statistical algorithms based on known translations (some of which are wrong due to the user correction feature), and doesn't have any of the knowledge of a fluent speaker, nor does it understand context, etc.
Wikipedias aren't all that much more reliable, because language is only incidental to their goal. For topics and terminology that aren't a widespread part of mainstream discourse, it's not uncommon for even native-language editors to have never learned the correct terms, and for those editors to just make up something so they can get on with writing their articles. I can't begin to tell you how much garbage I've deleted or reverted which was based on those two sources alone, and I'm not fluent enough in most languages to spot more than a fraction of those errors. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Very well said. --Vahag (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I agree; that's why I don't rely on it when I'm working in the main space. It seems less harmful here though, since I know it will be reviewed by a native speaker. But I'll try and be more rigorous from now on. --Barytonesis (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Vorziblix for admin[edit]

Pings aren't working? User_talk:Vorziblix#Admin --Rerum scriptor (talk) 19:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Persian entries[edit]

Hey. As a recent editor of Persian terms, can you help me with the entries in Category:Tbot entries (Persian)? There's just 19 entries there that need checking. Thanks! --P5Nd2 (talk) 09:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

No, Wonderfool. Ask a native Persian speaker, such as User:ZxxZxxZ. --Vahag (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Template:bor[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you are using {{bor}} without the notext=1 parameter. I want to notify you that the way this template works will change very shortly, following Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2017/November#Template:bor: Replace notext=1 with withtext=1. The sense of the parameters will be switched: whereas before you needed a parameter to suppress display of the text, in the new situation you'll need a parameter to include the text. The withtext=1 parameter is only temporary, to facilitate the transition to the new format. You can use it for now if you really want, but the goal is to get rid of it. —Rua (mew) 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

OK, will keep that in mind. --Vahag (talk) 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Rv edit + translation[edit]

Dalmo Pereira (talkcontribs) is back at it again, thought I'd let you know. Also, do you know how to translate cute in Armenian? In the sense of "pretty, huggable, cuddly" I mean. --Barytonesis (talk) 22:46, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. To this day I am scrubbing nonsensical translations from users like this added many years ago, because people can't patrol edits in small languages. I added some translations to cute, but none of them corresponds to the English concept exactly. Colloquially we usually temporarily code-switch to English for that word and say քյութ (kʿyutʿ). --Vahag (talk) 10:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

armenian on wiktionary[edit]

hello. do you have big plans for armenian on wiktionary (for example become the best english-armenian dictionary), or are you disenchanted. and how many entries do you think we should have to pretend at a good coverage. շնորհակալություն. --2A02:2788:A4:F44:F0BB:DC14:E2C1:420F 17:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

hello. i work just for fun, without a plan. don't care about the number of words. --Vahag (talk) 18:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Շնորհակալություն[edit]

Your Armenian dictionary entries are the best I have found online. The biggest difficulty I've found in learning my mother tongue is the different forms Armenian words take on. This makes finding the definition of an inflected or compound word very difficult (or even the reverse, figuring out the inflection of a word), but not one here! Շատ շնորհակալ եմ for your contribution. It's helped my Armenian studies greatly. If you have a Patreon or something, I'd donate to it to continue your effort. Vahan010 (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, but I'm rich already. I even have a black servant. --Vahag (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
That's not a very funny joke, Vahagn. --Victar (talk) 13:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
It's not a joke. --Vahag (talk) 14:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Failed Login Attempts[edit]

Hi Vahagn,

Just wanted to say that I received a message from Wikipedia saying that someone has tried to log into my account multiple times. I'm pretty sure it wasn't me. Any way to find out who it was? An IP address? Just wanted to be reassured that everything is fine. Obviously my account is still fine, as I'm using it, but what if it happens again? (Arax (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC))

I had a bunch of those recently too. Equinox 16:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Arax. I don't know anything about that issue, sorry. --Vahag (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Ok, thanks! (Arax (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC))

'See there for more'[edit]

This wording needs to be removed from all Persian entries, and you must stop using it, it's bloody awful. I know you won't mind my use of non-PC language. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Get me a native speaker to confirm that the wording is awkward, suggest an alternative and I will stop using the phrase. No one complained so far. --Vahag (talk) 22:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
This native is confused that anyone would be bothered by "see there for more".... — Z. [ קהת ] b"A. — 03:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying. The phrase is meant to replace q.v., because we try to avoid abbreviations. "See X for more" is probably better, but then you would have to repeat X twice. --Vahag (talk) 11:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Should we have an entry for which see? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 12:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
It is probably a sum of parts. --Vahag (talk) 12:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
This native finds the phrase baffling and would never have understood it had it not been for this lil thread. — Z. [ קהת ] b"A. — 17:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
There are no Google Books instances that I can see of 'see there for more' without a following noun. It must be followed by a noun, as in: 'see there for more information', 'see there for more details', 'see there for more 'about this'. 'See there for further information' is better, or simply 'see:'. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 16:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
"More" is functioning here as a pronoun. I would find "more information" or "more details" to be unnecessary; it's obvious enough that this is what is meant. — Z. [ קהת ] b"A. — 17:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hook (՚) creating links in Old Uyghur headers[edit]

Hi Vahagn,

I am trying to add some Old Uyghur lemmas from VATEC which are transliterated with hooks for some types of vowels. This hook apparantly exists in Armenian as well. Please take a loot at ՚yčm՚k. How do we prevent it creating separate links rather than just itself as a whole in the header.

Category: Olg Uyghur also lists various scripts like: Brahmi, Manichaean, Syriac... But actually there seems to be more to it. Should we also add Latin now since I want to add transliterations in Latin alphabet and theres a serious work on it here? --Anylai (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Anylai. I don't know why that website uses our apostrophe. It looks like the apostrophe is meant to transliterate a like sounds. The right half ring (ʾ) symbol is much more appropriate for that and will not cause the linking problem you describe. You should replace the Armenian apostrophes with the right half ring.
Most of the texts on that website are written in the Old Uyghur alphabet, including Altun Yarok. Apparently, Old Uyghur is not in Unicode. In such cases we allow the Latin transliterations as the main etnry (e.g. Book Pahlavi, Tocharian). Therefore, I added Latn as an alternative. But in cases of Old Uyghur texts in the Sogdian and Old Turkic alphabets I think you should use the native scripts. --Vahag (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, it indeed seems that most of the works there are in Old Uyghur script. I actually treat the runic writing separately and cite whenever I can, since I already know how to write and read it. If you dig enough website lets you see which words in which line are written in which script and directs you there. I will totally consider original Sogdian texts in this case. Thank you --Anylai (talk) 18:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Reference naming system[edit]

Vahagn, do you have a system for naming reference templates. It seems a bit arbitrary, with {{R:ira:GIPh2}} and {{R:ps:EVP}}. --Victar (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

I use either the author's name or the book's conventional abbreviation, if it is common. GIPh and EVP are the common ways to refer to these books. Remembering and typing the abbreviations is easier. --Vahag (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Do you have a source for book abbreviations? And in the case of {{R:ira:GIPh2}}, why include the volume number? Personally, I rather the author and date, which is how I normally find more books reserferenced. --Victar (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't have one source for the abbreviations. If you read literature you will notice that some works are much more commonly referred to as abbreviations. For example, HAB is never Ačaṙyan 1971–1979. GIPh too is almost never "Geiger / Ernst 1895–1901". See an example of references list in Cabolov. I probably used volume numbers in GIPh, because otherwise the syntax would have been to complicated for me. Feel free to merge them into one template. If you insist on standardizing the author + date format, I don't mind, but please keep the abbreviations as redirects. If I read GIPh in a text, I don't have to remember that it is Template:R:ira:Geiger-Ernst:1898–1901 in Wiktionary. --Vahag (talk) 10:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Refering to R:tut-pro:SDM[edit]

I can't figure out how to link to individual entries in R:tut-pro:SDM. For instance, if I want to add a reference the entry *bAd-rak for bayraq, I normally go to to the database and search for the meaning "flag", which makes the search engine return the result list for the term flag, but I can't "enter" the required entry itself, so I can link to it directly. The link to result list itself is terribly long, so I guess it shouldn't be linked to. How does one go about to get the short type of links like this one? Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 14:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, nemesis. The Starling database is a pain in the ass. You have to click on the "Altaic etymology", then back on "Turkic" and copy the url. But we should probably link the Proto-Altaic headword, not the Proto-Turkic. The print dictionary is organized around Proto-Altaic headwords. --Vahag (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. All ingenious is simple. Although not that simple, obviously. Now, may I be excused, I will go on an etymology-spree.Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 23:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Btw, I violently disagree with the proposition of linking to 'Proto-Altaic', even mentioning it actually, by addition of the waaay too polite "according to the controversial..." disclaimer. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
I didn't mean linking the Proto-Altaic form in etymologies. I meant using the Proto-Altaic form as the headword in {{R:tut-pro:SDM}}, because after all we are referencing the print dictionary in which Proto-Altaic forms are the lemmas. --Vahag (talk) 10:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

A couple of old manuscripts in Armenian online with Gallica[edit]

Hello, you probably know about this already but just in case you hadn't seen it: [1], [2] Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 12:54, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

I will not forgive you for driving away User:Palaestrator verborum from the project just because you showed me some manuscripts. --Vahag (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Some questions about Armenian[edit]

Hey, thanks for adding original Armenian from Kirakos of Ganjak's manuscript, I have some random questions about Armenian, most also concerning Turkic. If any of them require doing research feel free to answer them vaguely or not at all:

  1. I remember from comparative IE that Armenian had lost pretonic short *u and *i, for how long did this process operate i.e. how old does it imply the word is?
  2. I see that ə is written in some of the words of the manuscript but isn't in, for example, զրո (zro). Is this the same diaphoneme?
    1. What is the source of this sound? Does it imply that original /u/ was reduced/syncopated in նըմու (nəmu) and սըմու (səmu) by a soundlaw akin to the one mentioned above?
  3. Does /a/ imply centrality or is it a general low vowel like in Semitic and Iranian languages. That is, does using /a/ for Proto-Mongolic *e imply something like [ə/ɜ/ɐ] or could it also be [æ/ɛ/e̞]?
    1. Do Armeno-Kipchak/Turkish loans have /a/ for Proto-Turkic *e ?
  4. I see that for some (but not all) words Mongolic lenis stops are represented with unvoiced and fortis with aspirated stops. An increasingly popular theory posits exactly this for Proto-Mongolic, but does Armenian show the same thing for Semitic, Iranian and most importantly Turkic stops?
  5. Why are e and o more rare than ē and ō (IIRC this is a quality and not a quantity contrast, right?), are they more marked, or does this imply something about Mongolic.
  6. Do x and ł necessarily imply fricatives (this would be surprising for Middle Mongol) or could they merely mark post-velars/uvulars?
    1. Is Turkic/Semitic q written with x?
  7. *söni and *konïn are represented as սոյնի (soyni) and ղոյնա (łoyna), is this a native umlaut/palatality transfer process or does it reflect (subphonemic) palatalization in MM?

Thanks a lot just for reading through this! Crom daba (talk) 14:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@Crom daba: I'm not a linguist, so most of your questions are difficult for me. I will try to answer the ones I can.
Not writing /ə/ in the middle of words is an orthographical convention. Sometimes it is written to avoid ambiguity, e.g. when the metre is important or when transliterating foreign proper nouns. It's the same phoneme, whether written or not. Syncopated *u and *i are not the only sources of /ə/. Foreign /ə/-like sounds too can be taken over as /ə/, e.g. Turkish /ɯ/. It is also sometimes automatically inserted to break difficult consonant clusters.
In this list of Turkic and Mongolian borrowings attested in the Old Armenian literature, Armenian ա (a) almost always corresponds to Turkic a, but sometimes to ə, e or u.
Regarding the stops, note that Kirakos Gandzaketsi was writing in the Middle Armenian period, where stops had shifted from their Old Armenian qualities, depending on the position in the word and on region. His consonants probably reflect a pronunciation close to the modern Standard Western Armenian, so that e.g. պ (p) probably represents /b/ and բ (b) represents /pʰ/. Additionally, some writers employed historical orthography. The Mongolian word for "god" in Ganzaketsi's manuscripts is attested in the variants թանկրի (tʿankri), թանղրի (tʿanłri), թէնկրի (tʿēnkri), թընգրի (tʿəngri), թնգրի (tʿngri), թնկրի (tʿnkri).
By Gandzaketsi's time e is identical to ē and o is identical to ō. The distribution of variants reflects only orthographical conventions and preferences. Don't read anything into it.
In the same list of borrowings Turkic q is written either as խ (x), ղ (ł), sometimes ք (kʿ)․ Arabic q is borrowed as ղ (ł), կ (k) or խ (x).
Note also two other Mongolian borrowings outside Gandzaketsi: արքայուն (arkʿayun, Christian) < Mong. arkaun and նոյին (noyin, Mongol prince) < Mong. noyan.
Sorry for not being very helpful. --Vahag (talk) 19:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
That was pretty helpful. West Armenian pronunciation as you describe it does not seem like a good fit, orthographically voiced consonants are very unlikely to represent aspirates in this word list. I guess manuscripts show too much variation to be properly analyzed without some heavy comparative work. Crom daba (talk) 20:17, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Apostrophes in MacKenzie (1971) Pahlavi transliterations[edit]

Hey, Vahagn, I noticed you added ʾwstykʾn' with the final apostrophe found in MacKenzie (1971). I've always assumed they had nothing to do with the word itself, but I never understood their meaning. They have no phonetic value, as illustrated in his phonetic transcriptions, they only appear in Pahlavi, not Manichaean, and they're only found at the end of words. Do you have any further knowledge in this? --Victar (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Pinging @AryamanA, माधवपंडित --Victar (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
See WT:PAL TR, that's the transliteration of waw (in Book Pahlavi) or yodh (in Inscriptional Pahlavi) when they are used at the end of the word. If you mean what is the purpose of this letter, at least in some cases it is intentionally added simply to mark a word ending. But there are much archaistic traditions in Pahlavi scripts (Inscriptional Pahlavi and Book Pahlavi), such as using k, t, d instead of g, d, y, respectively, which clearly shows transition from the earlier form of Middle Persian. If I'm not mistaken, it may be also an archaism, reflecting the older /a/ as the final syllable which was omitted in Middle Persian, which may have been transformed to /ə/ before its disappearance. In fact, I remember one book which did transliterate that final letter in early Pahlavi inscriptions, as ə. The fact you mentioned that it is not used in Mannichaean, in which there is no archaism unlike that of Book Pahlavi, may support this idea. --Z 18:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
This seems to be a pretty compelling explanation to me. But should we bother having it at all if it's an archaism? I've noticed, for example, Cheung's dictionary doesn't have it at all. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करेंयोगदान) 19:01, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
I think we should certainly keep it because it is part of the word. Although I want to add that it is often referred to as "word ending", actually, but we are not sure, it may be more than just word ending, it may be part of the word's actual spelling. --Z 19:05, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
@ZxxZxxZ, AryamanA: It seems very similar to the free variation we see in Middle English. For example, verbs ending can be spelled, -en, -n, -ne, -enn, -enne, -∅, etc., but we've decided to standardize it to -en. If this and no phonetic value and is employed arbitrarily, I think we should either a) standardize it where etymologically appropriate, or b) omit it all together, which is what Cheung seems to have done. --Victar (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
@Victar: I have no opinion on this. --Vahag (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

hamaharz, hamharz[edit]

Hi Vahagn. Can you create theses entries in Armenian? It seems that they are Parthian loanwords but I am not sure about further etymology. Thanks.--Calak (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

համհարզ (hamharz, coincidence)? — [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 10:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
I am not sure. It is cognate with Parthian hāmhirz 'attendant, bodyguard' and MP. hamahl, hamāl 'equal, peer; comrade'. Check here.--Calak (talk) 12:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
See համհարզ (hamharz) and 𐫍𐫀𐫖𐫍𐫏𐫡𐫉 (hʾmhyrz). Google's translation as ‘coincidence’ is incorrect. --Vahag (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Now there's something that doesn't surprise me. — [ זכריה קהת ] Zack. — 18:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

"intuition" in Armenian[edit]

Hello. Do you vouch for this translation? I'm suspicious. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Of course it's wrong. I'm still cleaning up after that moron IP. --Vahag (talk) 11:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
More dubious translations: diff, diff, 217.131.163.101 (talk). --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 23:37, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for catching these. --Vahag (talk) 08:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
diff, 82.222.91.34 (talk) --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I hate the guts of this stupud Turkish IP. --Vahag (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I feel you. There's also 217.131.179.163 (talk), but I believe you've already taken care of these edits. No way to track all these IPs and clean it up all in one swoop? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I don't know. --Vahag (talk) 21:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
diff (rofl). --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
ヽ(ಠ_ಠ)ノ --Vahag (talk) 19:48, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
217.131.188.235 (talk), 217.131.179.85 (talk), 82.222.205.138 (talk) Per utramque cavernam (talk) 00:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Range queries covering all of them: [217.131.128.00 - 217.131.255,255] & [82.222.00.00 - 82.222.255.255] Chuck Entz (talk) 02:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you both. I went through all of the edits. --Vahag (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm still wondering if it was a vandal or a retard... --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
In my experience, there's often a great deal of overlap between the two... Chuck Entz (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Atitarev spotted another: diff > 151.250.157.186 (talk) --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 10:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, P.u.c. I have removed that one just now. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 10:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
The sad part is that shitty websites like Glosbe have extracted and propagated those fake translations. We may never get rid of them from the Internet. --Vahag (talk) 11:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
diff --Per utramque cavernam 14:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
That IP is a cunt. --Vahag (talk) 19:43, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks to @Wyang (at Talk:շնութիւն), I've found a few others (taken from [3])
Per utramque cavernam 10:52, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you to you and Wyang for finding these. --Vahag (talk) 16:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Armenian MP borrowing[edit]

Hey Vahagn, I notice you seem to have an aversion to deriving Old Armenian entries directly from Middle Persian, i.e. բժիշկ (bžišk). Is this just a throwback to old entries, or is there some other reason? Thanks. --Victar (talk) 03:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Victar. The most numerous and oldest layer of Iranian borrowings in Armenian is from Middle North West Iranian, not Middle South West Iranian. See the short summary in Olsen. Supposedly there are also a few borrowings from Old Iranian and East Iranian languages. Distinguishing between these is one of the main problems of Armenian linguistics. See especially {{R:xcl:Bolognesi}} and {{R:xcl:Schmitt:1983}}. Some sources blithely derived everything from Middle Persian either because they are outdated, from a time when the differences between various Iranian dialects were not fully understood (e.g. Ačaṙean calls both Middle Persian and Parthian "Pahlavi"), or they are lazy. We should not claim a Middle Persian origin unless there are specific phonological grounds to do so. --Vahag (talk) 11:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I believe Middle Persian basically replaced Parthian by the the time Old Armenian rolled around, so if borrowed from NW Iranian, wouldn't it have been from Median? --Victar (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Old Armenian didn't roll around in the 5th century. It began to be written in that century after the discovery of the Armenian script and revealed the borrowings that it had been collecting in the previous centuries, especially from Parthian during the Parthian empire (3rd century BC – 3rd century AD) and then Middle Persian during the Sassanian Empire. But note that the Parthian Arsacid dynasty of Armenia continued to rule until the 5th century, when in Iran the Parthians had long been overthrown. The Iranian influence diminsihed greatly after we adopted Christianity in the early 4th century AD. Middle Persian did not have the same chance to influence Armenian as did Parthian.
But note that according to the linguist Anahit Périkhanian, many of the Parthian loanwords should rather be attributed to an older "Middle Median" stratum. This hypothetical language is the successor of traditional Median, which remained in contact with Armenian until Parthian displaced it by the 2nd century BC. Since this language is not attested, her view is not widely shared. But if Yarshater is right that the modern Tatic languages of Northwestern Iran are the direct descendants of Median, then it makes sense to assume an unattested Middle Median language.
Note also the controversy around the given names Old Armenian Շաւարշ (Šawarš) and Շաւասպ (Šawasp), the š- of which cannot be explained by the Middle Persian or Parthian descendants of *ĉyaHwáh, but which is present in the Eastern Iranian descendants.
All these complexities mean that the safest way to handle the Armenian borrowings is the formula "An Iranian borrowing; compare this and that". --Vahag (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I see, so you're saying that the Iranian borrowings are actually older than Old Armenian. Could that be called proto-Armenian or pre-Old Armenian? Would older borrowing differ in any way than later ones, i.e. undergo any Old Armenian phonetic changes?
It definitely makes sense that many words actually came from Median, given the historical interaction, and some sort of Middle Mendian form seems plausible. Kermanic languages are also thought to be descended from Median.
I don't see the problem with Old Armenian Շաւարշ (Šawarš) and Շաւասպ (Šawasp). Why not just say they're from NE Iranian than? --Victar (talk) 19:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
It would be simply called "Old Armenian". A language's history does not begin with its first attestation. Very few borrowings supposedly happened in the Proto-Armenian stage, because they underwent the Armenian consonant shift, e.g. պարտէզ (partēz), արծաթ (arcatʿ).
Eastern Iranian borrowings are hard to explain geographically. One theory is that the Parni brought traces of an Eastern Iranian language with them. Another possible source are the invading Scythians who destroyed Urartu and settled the territory in Armenia later called Շակաշէն (Šakašēn, Sacasena, literally the land of Sakas). --Vahag (talk) 20:23, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Well, my question is do any Median-period borrowing exhibit archaic features not found in attested Old Armenian? The Scythians were well traveled, so I have no problem reconciling Old Armenian Շաւարշ (Šawarš) and Շաւասպ (Šawasp) as Scynthian borrowings. --Victar (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
The supposed telltales of Median borrowings in Armenian are the words with -նձ- (-nj-) instead of -նջ- (-nǰ-), as in բրինձ (brinj), պղինձ (płinj), գանձ (ganj), the words with -հ- (-h-) for intervolcalic Iranian *d, as in զրահ (zrah), սրահ (srah), Ասպահան (Aspahan), words with a prothetic vowel before initial sp- and - , as in աշխարհ (ašxarh), ասպար (aspar). --Vahag (talk) 13:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Տոլյատի[edit]

Why leaving etymology (and therefore categorization) incomplete? [ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo] (parla con me) 19:55, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

It's not incomplete. A reasonable person does not expect to find the etymology of a Russian place name in an Armenian entry. He can find further information one click away. And having Տոլյատի (Tolyati) in Category:Armenian terms derived from Italian is not interesting to anyone. By your logic we should also etymologize the Italian surname Togliatti on the Armenian page. Where would that stop? Latin, PIE? That information clutters the page, and what is worse, leads to duplicated content which will inevitably get out of sync. There are no clear rules on where to cut the etymology chain, but in this case the common sense tells us to stop at the immediate source: Russian. --Vahag (talk) 20:49, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Well, if Wiktionary’s goal is to be as complete as possible, I don’t see the point in deleting this part, regardless of how interesting it may result. In this case, I could not find any further information about the surname, which means to me we must stop there. That’s all: I just didn’t understand the reason behind your deed. [ˌiˑvã̠n̪ˑˈs̪kr̺ud͡ʒʔˌn̺ovã̠n̪ˑˈt̪ɔ̟t̪ːo] (parla con me) 21:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

R:CAL[edit]

Template:R:CAL is throwing errors. There's been a change in their database syntax apparently and it's made a mess of our citation form. I don't know enough to try to fix the system but we can no longer link as we used to - sample lemma change listed here makes it hard to establish the correct form to cite, should we add a TITLE= to the template to list the actual lemma form? Right now we're seeing {{R:CAL|q%24y%24+A}} but we could add a title for a form like {{R:CAL|q%24y%24+A|qšyš}} to display the result as ”qšyš”, in The Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon Project, Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College, 1986–? Ogress (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Not my area of knowledge. You can ask at WT:GP. --Vahag (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
I'd suggest having one parameter for the part of speech code in the link (A in the link above) and an optional parameter for the word (in Aramaic, Hebrew, or scholarly transliteration) if different from the entry name. Then a module can convert between these formats as needed for the URL and link text. I'm working on a module for that now. — Eru·tuon 21:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

ժանգ[edit]

Hi Vahagn. Can you add etymology section to this entry? It should be a NW Iranian loanword. Thank you.--Calak (talk) 09:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I can. --Vahag (talk) 15:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello again. Can you create փուշտիպան? Thanks.--Calak (talk) 12:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Sure. Kurdish too has a cognate: pištuvan. --Vahag (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, they are pištīwān "supporter" in CK, SK and pišt(ī/ō)vān "id." in NK.--Calak (talk) 18:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vahagn. Etymology section for սմբակ please, thanks.--Calak (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

On it, chief. --Vahag (talk) 13:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
hahaha! so համար please.--Calak (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Can't do right now. I added it to WT:RE:xcl. --Vahag (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
@Calak, here you go: համար (hamar). --Vahag (talk) 18:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
wow, great job!--Calak (talk) 18:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
@Calak, what makes you think the Kurdish word is related? Its meaning does not fit. --Vahag (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, it is cognate with Hawrami ژەمەن (žaman, meal), related to Parthian 𐫋𐫖𐫀𐫗 (žamān, time). For semantic shift time → time for eating (meal) see Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/mēlą and meal.--Calak (talk) 19:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Interesting. In any case it is best to dump all the Iranian forms in a centralized manner in the Proto-Iranian page, and if it does not exist, in the Persian descendant page. Central Kurdish ژەم (žam, meal) can perhaps stay in the Armenian etymology, because relevantly it too has lost the ending. --Vahag (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, sorry but I undid your massive request at WT:RE:xcl. Lists in request pages should be kept short, otherwise they will be ignored. Also, rare words don't get a priority, unless they are interesting to a requester for some specific reason. --Vahag (talk) 12:57, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vahagn. Can you check spelling of these entries? Thanks.--Calak (talk) 19:34, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, that I can do. --Vahag (talk) 21:51, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, can you check կնձուլ? Thanks.--Calak (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, see կանձուլ (kanjul). Asatrian has more on this Wortsippe. --Vahag (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vahag. Can you write first four lines of this book for me here? It is hard for me. Thanks.--Calak (talk) 12:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, it's Aybbenaran kʿiwrterēn ew hayerēn and Alifpēčiwz gurmanči u armēni. The author is Mkrtičʿ Tigranean. This version in an Armenian library has a better quality. By the way, I have been using the 1857 and 1872 Bible translations into Armenian-script Kurdish for the attestation of Armenian-script Kurdish. E.g. սեղան (sełan). --Vahag (talk) 12:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Vahag. I should decode this script for Kurdish language. Now it is clear Kurdish uses West Armenian pronunciation.--Calak (talk) 12:58, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
This particular book and the Bible translations were published in Constantinople, by Western-Armenian-speaking Armenians, hence the orthography. I assume the ones published in Eastern Armenia use the Eastern Armenian pronunciation of Armenian letters. --Vahag (talk) 13:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi again Vahag. I checked 4 pages. It seems that there is no distinction between a, ā and u, ū in this script. But I should work on it more. Unfortunately I am too slow so I need your help. If it is possible anu if you have time plz check pages 33 and 34 ([4]). There is 4 columns. Please write Armenian words for me (only Armenian not Kurdish). There is no hurry. Thanks a lot.--Calak (talk) 10:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, @Calak. Armenian rightly does not distinguish vowel lengths, because they do not exist in nature. No one can convince me there is a difference between ship and sheep. Anyway, the Armenian words are as follows below. I have normalized the spellings. --Vahag (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. Vahagn how does West Armenian indicate aspirated and non-aspirated sounds (e.g t and t', k and k', p and p', č and č')? In this Kurdish script I am not sure which one is aspirated or non-aspirated letter.--Calak (talk) 21:34, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, Western Armenian does not have non-aspirated p, t, k, č, j. They have merged with b, d, g, ǰ, c. That is its main difference in phonology from Eastern Armenian and Old Armenian. Non-aspirated p, t, k, č, j of words inherited from Old Armenian are written the same way as in Old Armenian but pronounced b, d, g, ǰ, čʿ. Non-aspirated p, t, k of foreign languages are transliterated using փ, թ, ք (pʿ, tʿ, kʿ) or sometimes բ, դ, գ (b, d, g). To take your textbook, it transliterates keşk‎ as գաշք (gaškʿ), which would be pronounced as /kʰaʃkʰ/ in Western Armenian. I don't know if it uses a mix of transliterations in one word or has assigned գ (g) to unaspirated /k/ in this ad hoc orthography. --Vahag (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much Vahagn. For this thextbook we have
pênc, բէնճ beside p'ortûqal, բօրթուքալ!
heşt, to, հաշթ, թօ beside t'û, թու!
hêk, golik, k'er, yek, հէք, գօլըք , գար, եէք
çar, çil, չար, չըլ beside ç'êleg չէլակ!
It seems that it has no law.--Calak (talk) 14:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

kiṟīk “neck,” from Armenian. Do you know its Armenian source?--Calak (talk) 20:58, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, I do not know or find any similar word with the meaning "neck". Abaev II: 330 discusses the cognates of this word without any Armenian parallels. Kurdish qiṙik ‘throat’ has a homonym meaning ‘crow, raven’, which could be borrowed from Armenian dialectal (Van) կռիկ (kṙik, crow, raven). Perhaps Asatrian has confused these homonyms. --Vahag (talk) 15:03, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
@Calak, I found the source of those Zaza borrowings. It is this 1987 article by Asatrian, where he has Zazaki kirīk (a hook to which a rope is tied), from Armenian կեռիկ (keṙik, little hook), from կեռ (keṙ). The Zaza gloss must have been "corrected" by someone in Iranica. --Vahag (talk) 14:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Did you read mōz there?--Calak (talk) 17:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
@Calak, I read and added his etymology, but still I prefer our previous theory for the reasons given in մոզ (moz). --Vahag (talk) 13:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Me too. Since Armenian almost has no influence in Southern Kurdish (and Gorani), and mūz is common in this dialect, I think it is inherited. Compare also Gurani موْزی (mɔzī, a small green mosquito), beside Zazaki and Mazandarani. We can't take all of them from Armenian.--Calak (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
The Kurdish 'neck' word seems like it could be cognate to Proto-Slavic *kъrkъ and words mentioned therein. Crom daba (talk) 16:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
If it isn't simply an onomatopoeia for throaty sounds. Crom daba (talk)
For the Ossetian cognate хъур (qur, throat) Bailey apud Abaev II: 330 assumes a contamination of PIr. *gar- ‘to swallow’ (< *gʷerh₃-) with PIr. *kur- ‘neck’, whence Avestan kurit- ‘neck-helmet’. According to Abaev, an onomatopoeia is also possible. --Vahag (talk) 16:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Crom daba: Thank you guys. Yes it is a common word in all Kurdish dialects; Northern Kurdish qirrik, Central Kurdish قوڕگ (qurrg), Southern Kurdish قوڕگ (qurrig), قوڕێ (qurrê), Laki قڕووگنە (qirrûgne).--Calak (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vahag. Can you give me more information about ä sound in Armenian? Thanks.--Calak (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Calak: it exists only in dialects, mainly in the areas of Vaspurakan, Persarmenia, Syunik and Artsakh. It represents /æ/. I am not familiar with Armenian dialectology, but as far as I know ä originates from Old Armenian ա (a) under certain circumstances. One such circumstance is Adjarian's law. For example, according to that law Old Armenian բարակ (barak) becomes Van päräk, Moks-Çatak pärak, Urmia päräkʸ, Karabakh pä/ɛrak. --Vahag (talk) 18:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, where did you get this? Such a word does not exist and even such a spelling is impossible. --Vahag (talk) 10:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

{{R:ira-ker:Asatrian:2011|page=263}} Cognate with NK, CK mêw and NP mow (CNP maw).--Calak (talk) 10:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
@Calak, I find only dialectal մով (mov, a grapevine variety) and dialectal Turkish mev (üzüm kütüğü ve çubuğu, asma; üzüm yaprağı). Middle Armenian *mēw is nowhere to be found. As I said, its spelling doesn't even look Armenian. Asatrian must have made an error there and meant Middle Persian. See here, page 77. --Vahag (talk) 11:45, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
In that article, Asatrian always use Pahlavi instead of "Middle Persian". In that entry, Pahlavi form is before Middle Armenian (i.e Pahlavi mēvak, Middle Armenian mēw). However I think you are right.--Calak (talk) 11:58, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Vahag do you a searchable version of this?--Calak (talk) 13:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

@Calak, I have it searchable by the Russian text and Latin transliteration of Kurdish, but not by the Kurdish text in the Arabic script. My OCR software does not support its recognition. --Vahag (talk) 13:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

šnwhl[edit]

Hey. I don't give a damn about Middle Persian, but someone used this word in my game. It looks to me that šnōhr is the pronunciation, not the transliteration, of šnwhl. Can you confirm this? --Cien pies 6 (talk) 09:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

It is the transcription. The transliteration is šnwhl itself. We started distinguishing between the two recently. --Vahag (talk) 19:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

նշանեմ[edit]

Isn't it ultimately from Persian نشان, via Ottoman Turkish نشان? Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

It's a classical Old Armenian word. Can't be from Persian or Turkish. --Vahag (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Old Armenian ends in the 11th century, Persian starts in the 9th, so hypothetically it can? Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 18:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
"Classical" Old Armenian is the language of the 5th century Golden Age, especially as attested in the Bible translation. I meant that նշանեմ (nšanem) is from that period, so it can't be from the new languages. --Vahag (talk) 19:31, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Oh right, I saw now that the Iranian etymology is already there under 'nishn'. Nvm then. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Personal question[edit]

Hi. If you don't mind my asking, what's your profession? You've said before you're not a linguist, but your work here looks top-notch (AFAICT). Per utramque cavernam 13:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words. I have two professions, both far from linguistics. I don't want to say which, because then my wiki account, with which I have made many racist, sexist and homophobic jokes, could be easily linked to my real-world persona :) --Vahag (talk) 15:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Indeed, it's not like you have your full name as your username... —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
"Vahagn Petrosyan" is a common name. I can always plausibly deny this one is me. --Vahag (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Also, "jokes". --Victar (talk) 02:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
You are right. I should stop using humor as an excuse. Actually, in the past my comments were really intended as jokes. I was playing a Stephen Colbert-like conservative character. But over time the mask merged with the face. At some point I was red-pilled. I don't find the gradual destruction of my world by the postmodernist left as funny anymore. --Vahag (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
We do live in a very polarized world today. --Victar (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
I am enjoying the idea that just knowing your job would immediately identify you (are you the pope?). Equinox 23:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Not pope, no. But it's a rare job. Only 32 people are licensed in Armenia to do it. --Vahag (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

ձիաբոռ[edit]

Hello Vahagn! May I wish you to make the above blue so as to finish up the following instances of a likely Eurasian w:Wanderwort?

KYPark (talk) 05:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Not you again and your crazy theories. --Vahag (talk) 16:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, anyway. Good money drives out bad, in this case. KYPark (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Proto-Germanic loanwords in Iranian[edit]

We know there were certainly contacts between Proto-Germanic and Iranian peoples, Germanicists freely talk about Proto-Germanic loanwords from Iranian in Wiktionary, like this one: https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction:Proto-Germanic/paþaz (Of course this word is clearly from a western Iranian language, compare Old Persian paθi but Ossetian fændag) but it seems you don't allow that Iranologists publish their works on this subject here, what is the reason? Mojshahmiri (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

This is a dictionary. We provide etymologies (and reconstruction entries as an extension of those) based on reliable sources where possible- we don't "publish" anyone's "works" here. Chuck Entz (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
I don't see this rule in Terms of Use, if it really exists then you should remove more than 90 percent of etymologies of Persian words, will you do it? I can list them for you. -Mojshahmiri (talk) 07:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
@Mojshahmiri: you claim Proto-Germanic borrowing for Modern Persian and Middle Persian words. That is impossible chronologically and geographically. The situation is different for borrowings into Proto-Germanic from Eastern-Iranian-speaking nomads of the steppe. --Vahag (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
As I mentioned above most of Iranian borrowings into Proto-Germanic are from actually western Iranian languages, like Persian, not Eastern Iranian languages, like Scytho-Sarmatian, Modern/Middle Persian is a continuation of Old Persian. It is certainly possible both chronologically and geographically, my master's degree thesis was about this historical fact: http://dlib.ical.ir/site/catalogue/639964 -Mojshahmiri (talk) 07:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Mojshahmiri, seeing how you conduct yourself here, and in online forums, I think it's for the best that you choose a different community from Wiktionary. --Victar (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean? Yes, I'm the founder and admin of one of the largest history communities on the web (AllEmpires.com) with more than 5,000 members (including 800 expert historians), just search for "history forum" in google to find the place of my website, AllEmpries.com has been used as reference in thousands wiki pages, like this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cataphract#cite_note-30 Is it you reason that I should leave wiki? -Mojshahmiri (talk) 07:08, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I was referring to your unbecoming conduct in that forum, which mirrors what you have shown here on Wiktionary, but whilst on the topic of said forum, I find it full of nutbag conspiracy theorists and racial bigotry. No one should be citing that site for anything. --Victar (talk) 14:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Your words are familiar to me, aren't you one of members who were banned by me in AllEmpires forum? Do you want to avenge here?! -Mojshahmiri (talk) 16:32, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Haha, no, but it sounds like whoever that is, we would get along just fine. --Victar (talk) 16:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

կաղամախի Etymology[edit]

Congratulations on your diligent efforts to run the etymology to ground. I am not at all surprised that there might be disagreement as to species of Populus. I was surprised that Platanus was also in the running. The bark and leaf (two of the most readily observed characteristics) are very different in Platanus and Populus. It is hard to see how both types of trees could ever have been covered by they same term, unless the term was analogous to tree. DCDuring (talk) 19:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Both are riparian trees. In my experience it's not uncommon for borrowed terms to be applied to different trees at different times, and don't forget that there are multiple translations involved in the various sources as they come to us. As an illustration of what can happen: in the following, you'll notice that the correspondence between the species in the different languages is rather loose. Ancient Greek λεύκη (leúkē, white poplar) translates both Hebrew לבנה (I think) and Hebrew תאשור. (Hebrew תאשור is translated in Isaiah 60:13 as Ancient Greek κέδρος (kédros, cedar), and Hebrew לבנה in Genesis 30:37 as Ancient Greek στυρακίνος (sturakínos) (from Ancient Greek στύραξ (stúrax, storax)). This kind of confusion is common in translations from the Hebrew scriptures because of the lack of contemporary sources and the centuries (perhaps millenia) between texts and their translations. Also, people were focusing on religious rather than botanical matters.
The Hosea passage cited in the entry:
ի ներքոյ կաղնեաց եւ կաղամախեաց եւ վարսաւոր ծառոց
i nerkʿoy kałneacʿ ew kałamaxeacʿ ew varsawor caṙocʿ
under oaks and white poplars and leafy trees
originally from
תַּ֣חַת אַלּ֧וֹן וְלִבְנֶ֛ה וְאֵלָ֖ה
under oak and [species uncertain] and terebinth
which is translated into Greek as
ὑποκάτω δρυὸς καὶ λεύκης καὶ δένδρου συσκιάζοντος
hupokátō druòs kaì leúkēs kaì déndrou suskiázontos
under oak and white poplar and [shady trees?]
which becomes Latin
subtus quercum et populum et terebinthum
under oak and poplar and terebinth
In English, the King James Version has
under oaks and poplars and elms
and New Revised Standard Version has
under oak, poplar, and terebinth
The Isaiah passage:
Եւ բղխեցուցից յանջուր երկրին զմայրն եւ զտօսախն, զմուրտն եւ զնոճն եւ զսօսն, զսարդն եւ զսարոյն եւ զկաղամախն, զգին եւ զփայտն իւղոյ։
Ew błxecʿucʿicʿ yanǰur erkrin zmayrn ew ztōsaxn, zmurtn ew znočn ew zsōsn, zsardn ew zsaroyn ew zkałamaxn, zgin ew zpʿaytn iwłoy.
I will produce in the dry land the cedar and box, the myrtle and cypress and plane, the cedar and cypress and white poplar, the juniper and the [literally olive wood].
אֶתֵּ֤ן בַּמִּדְבָּר֙ אֶ֣רֶז שִׁטָּ֔ה וַהֲדַ֖ס וְעֵ֣ץ שָׁ֑מֶן אָשִׂ֣ים בָּעֲרָבָ֗ה בְּר֛וֹשׁ תִּדְהָ֥ר וּתְאַשּׁ֖וּר יַחְדָּֽ
I will plant in the desert cedar, acacia and myrtle, [literally, oil tree], I will set on the desert plain pine, [uncertain- perhaps elm] and [uncertain] together
θήσω εἰς τὴν ἄνυδρον γῆν κέδρον καὶ πύξον καὶ μυρσίνην καὶ κυπάρισσον καὶ λεύκην
thḗsō eis tḕn ánudron gên kédron kaì púxon kaì mursínēn kaì kupárisson kaì leúkēn
I will plant in the dry land the cedar and box, the myrtle and cypress, and white poplar:
dabo in solitudine cedrum et spinam et myrtum et lignum olivae ponam in deserto abietem ulmum et buxum simul
I will plant in the wilderness cedar and thorn and myrtle and [literally olive wood], in the desert fir, elm and box at the same time
KJV
I will plant in the wilderness the cedar, the shittah tree, and the myrtle, and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the fir tree, and the pine, and the box tree together
NRSV
I will put in the wilderness the cedar, the acacia, the myrtle, and the olive; I will set in the desert the cypress, the plane and the pine together

Chuck Entz (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

For Hebrew לבנה see also Löw, Immanuel (1924) Die Flora der Juden[5] (in German), volume 3, Wien und Leipzig: R. Löwit, pages 338–339, and the chapter for the family; for Platanaceae Löw, Immanuel (1924) Die Flora der Juden[6] (in German), volume 3, Wien und Leipzig: R. Löwit, pages 65–67.
I have now created the Arabic word for the poplar حور. To the best I know nobody has hereunto recognized it as borrowed from Aramaic. @DCDuring Fay Freak (talk) 02:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
BTW the կաղամախի page and particularly with the Hebrew here shows again how the quotation templates need support for translated sources of quoted translations as laid out in Talk:kalsarikänni. We are in the fourth row with English already: Hebrew → Greek → Armenian → English. Fay Freak (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, guys. I think in this case the whiteness of the bark and/or leaves is what unites the various trees.
{{Q}} should be expanded to handle several rows of translation. It should also have the ability to show the edition from which the text is quoted and should allow links to websites other than Wikisource. --Vahag (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Khatun خاتون[edit]

Both etymologies look wrong and made-up. Khatun itself seems a Sogdian word.[7] So the Persian equivalent is a direct loanword from Sogdian not Turkish. Plus the Turkish one hatun is a Sogdian loanword too.[8][9] --94.177.77.215 05:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't want to deal with this. Please raise the issue at WT:ES. --Vahag (talk) 11:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

What do you think?[edit]

Please look through Special:Contributions/94.109.8.199/16 and tell me what you think. Chuck Entz (talk) 03:02, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Chuck Entz, his edits are mostly bullshit, not to mention poorly formatted. I would revert all of them, even if some bits of information could have been salvaged. --Vahag (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
That's what I figured, but I wasn't sure enough to block him. That was Nemzag. I wanted to give him a chance, since he seemed to be trying very hard to tone down his eccentricities. I didn't want to let him know I recognized him until I was ready to block him because then he would stop trying. Now I've got some cleanup to do <sigh>... Chuck Entz (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Sadly, people don't change. --Vahag (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2018 (UTC)