Citations:cdesign proponentsist

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

English citations of cdesign proponentsist

creationist[edit]

2005
2006
2007
2008
2010
2011
2012
ME « 15th c. 16th c. 17th c. 18th c. 19th c. 20th c. 21st c.
  • 2005 November 7, Matzke, Nick, “Missing link: “cdesign proponentsists””, in The Panda's Thumb[1], archived from the original on 2012-10-28, retrieved 2012-10-28:
    The amazing beast, “cdesign proponentsists” was discovered directly above strata containing the well-known and ubiquitous species “creationists”. Previous research by Forrest had dated the layer the missing link was found in to the latter half of 1987.
  • 2005 December 21, Richardson, B., “Re: Discovery Institute Responds”, in talk.origins, Usenet[2], message-ID <43a8d1e9-robomod@ediacara.org>:
    Just tell them you're a cdesign proponentsist.
  • 2006 July 2, Raging Bee, “Larry’s Solo Act (comment)”, in Dispatches from the Creation Wars[3], retrieved 2012-10-28:
    Because the entire “cdesign proponentsist” movement is, at its root, driven by the inability of certain people to let go of their prejudices, mistaken understandings, and just plain obsolete worldviews.
  • 2007 November 30, Mark, “Disingenuous? Stupid? Both?”, in Denialism Blog[4], retrieved 2012-10-28:
    (Never trust a cdesign proponentsist on a quote):
  • 2007 December 15, Marjanovi?, David, “Billy Dembski, pious and deluded (comment)”, in Pharyngula[5], retrieved 2012-10-28:
    On the “Wells lies. Again.” thread a few months ago, I pointed out to the cdesign proponentsist that the existence of Stupid Design falsified ID.
  • 2008 February 18, Sparky, “What's that appendix for, anyway?”, in Discount Thoughts[6], retrieved 2012-10-28:
    Famous cdesign proponentsist Dembski brought it up again recently in his list of ID "predictions" (click for epic fail).
  • 2008 March 4, Clayton, Richard, “Re: WingNutDaily: I can't wait to be 'Expelled'”, in talk.origins, Usenet[7], message-ID <99a94226-b012-4f58-8629-bc540a1d4a5b@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>:
    Funny how cdesign proponentsists like to apply terms like "doctrinaire" and "zealots" to scientists.
  • 2010 October 3, Cornish-Bowden, Athel, “Re: A Query for All”, in talk.origins, Usenet[8], message-ID <8gru21Fne2U1@mid.individual.net>:
    You're forgetting that cdesign proponentsists are purely scientific in their approach. Nothing religious about it.
  • 2011 April 8, J, Frank, “Re: Warning to the NON-Christians in this group”, in alt.politics.homosexuality, Usenet[9], message-ID <7856598f-1cae-401b-9f88-9e658121fb4d@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:
    But you must not like him because he appointed Judge Jones, who ruled against the cdesign proponentsists, calling their nonsense "breathtaking inanity."
  • 2012 June 27, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names, “Texas GOTP wants to ban thinking in schools. This is NOT a joke.”, in alt.politics, Usenet[10], message-ID <ndpmu7tb7env4ul8oi2s919dumgnh4f7kf@6ax.com>:
    Heck, it’s not even the subtle shift from an open “Cdesign proponentsist” agenda to a pseudo-neutral call for students to be able to answer “God Did It” on a biology test “without fear of retribution or discrimination,” or even the plan to base all US History lessons on the art of John McNaughton.