Reconstruction talk:Latin/Fata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attestation[edit]
According to Gaffiot 2016 this term is attested in inscriptions, what should be done about this entry? AuroraeLux (talk) 02:10, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe find a second source to verify this and then it should be moved to a simple Latin entry: Fata. --- 2.203.201.61 15:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- I found an example of the ablative plural Fatabus in CIL 4209 and 5005. --- (AuroraeLux (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC))
- @Nicodene It seems to be attested. Kwékwlos (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- It sure does. Nicodene (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Nicodene It seems to be attested. Kwékwlos (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- I found an example of the ablative plural Fatabus in CIL 4209 and 5005. --- (AuroraeLux (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2019 (UTC))