Talk:अर्थशास्त्र

Grammatical numbers in declension

@JohnC5 As a proper noun, are you sure that this word should have dual and plural forms listed in its declension table? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 07:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@I'm so meta even this acronym forsooth, I believed it should only be in the singular but could not determine a method by which to limit it thusly after a quick glance at Template:sa-decl-noun-a-n. —JohnC5 07:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Thanks for getting back to me. I couldn't find a means of restricting the declension table either (having looked at {{sa-decl-noun-a-n}}, {{sa-decl-noun}}, and Category:Sanskrit declension-table templates). I may try to correct this shortcoming if I ever get round to learning some Sanskrit. Thanks again for creating this entry. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 07:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@I'm so meta even this acronym No problem! —JohnC5 07:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@JohnC5: :-) Is there any chance you could create a soft-redirect entry for the alternative form you listed, अर्थशास्त्रक (Árthaśāstraka), too, please? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 07:53, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@I'm so meta even this acronym: :P —JohnC5 08:00, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Thank you muchly. :-)  — I.S.M.E.T.A. 08:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)