Talk:១០០០០០០
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Smuconlaw in topic RFD discussion: April–June 2017
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
For the same reason that 1000000 doesn't exist. The IPA doesn't belong here anyway, but should instead go to the actual spelling of the term, whatever that may be. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 21:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- 1000000 apparently doesn't exist for the same reason 994,020,440,101,954 doesn't exist. If you figure out the actual spelling of the term, what would be the harm in redirecting to it? Siuenti (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- One good argument is that the software automatically redirects you to ១០០០០០០ if you search for 1000000. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The reason 1000000 doesn't redirect to million appears to be that because there are an infinite number of SOP numbers, NSOP numbers, which are nearly, but not quite, as infinite, must get the same treatment. Siuenti (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- One good argument is that the software automatically redirects you to ១០០០០០០ if you search for 1000000. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I am assuming the "actual spelling" target is NSOP. That makes it a legitimate search term and synonym for a Wiktionary entry. We should make it as easy as possible for people who used the term to find the word. If there are no other possible NSOP targets for the title, redirect it. If there are possible targets, which seems unlikely in this case, make a page like 1000. If people think this should be deleted I would like to know if 1000 should also be deleted, and if not why not. Siuenti (talk) 19:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted – there is well-established consensus that such numerals are sum-of-parts: see, for example, "Talk:105". — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)