Talk:又閣

Check definitions

@Mar vin kaiser Can you check the definitions here? I'm especially unsure about the conjunction sense. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 22:28, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I hardly think of them as conjunctions too. More of just an adverb. Even in sources I look at, its meaning is just "又、再", which is not a conjunction at all. Even the example there doesn't look like it's used as a conjunction. Perhaps when you translate it to English, it's better to translate it as if it were a conjunction, because it wouldn't translate well in English as an adverb for that specific example, but in the Minnan sentence itself, it's not used as a conjunction at all, in my opinion. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 01:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

@Mar vin kaiser It seems like the second example has a different meaning from the first one. Do you see a difference? — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 02:16, 1 October 2016 (UTC)