Talk:जुआ
Latest comment: 6 years ago by AryamanA
@माधवपंडित IDK if Sauraseni is attested, but it should be Lua error in Module:parameters at line 159: Parameter 1 should be a valid language or etymology language code; the value psu is not valid. See WT:LOL and WT:LOL/E. if it is (Woolner mentions Lua error in Module:parameters at line 159: Parameter 1 should be a valid language or etymology language code; the value psu is not valid. See WT:LOL and WT:LOL/E.). The form you gave is Maharastri, which is the default in most grammars and dictionaries (including Turners). —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 18:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- @AryamanA: I see.. apparently Sanskrit -t- was not dropped in Sauraseni but instead voiced, I keep forgetting that. Hindi Shabdasagara gave "प्रा० जूत" which was in fact Pali. Does Turner give Sauraseni at all? In the entry there was "jūa --, jūva" for which I assumed the first was Maharashtri and the second was Sauraseni. Thanks for fixing it! -- माधवपंडित (talk) 01:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @माधवपंडित: No problem! Nah, Turner only gives Maharashtri. I'm not sure what Shabdsagar does, but it seems to be Pali like you said. Normally I try to guess the Sauraseni using the sound changes I know of, but often Pischel's and Woolner's grammars list variants for all dialects, which can be useful if one has the time to look through them. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 02:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)