Talk:BJAODN
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
BJAODN[edit]
As per CFI --Keene 08:33, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep all, as properly tagged. --Connel MacKenzie 08:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete as above. This isn't even used in discussion, as far as I'm aware.DAVilla 14:12, 4 July 2007 (UTC)- Keep as tagged, per Visviva. DAVilla 14:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. —RuakhTALK 17:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, WMF jargon not unique to Wiktionary. Used heavily (even as a verb) on WP, and I'm fairly sure I've seen it on Commons and Meta as well. -- Visviva 11:54, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as not independent. JackLumber 21:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- We should really make a note about wikijargon as an exception on WT:CFI once it is established what the actual requirements are. I don't think anyone (besides apparently yourself?) is suggesting that
{{wjargon}}
is entirely inappropriate here. DAVilla 14:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- We should really make a note about wikijargon as an exception on WT:CFI once it is established what the actual requirements are. I don't think anyone (besides apparently yourself?) is suggesting that