Talk:aliquoting

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

It looks like a lot of b.g.c hits to me, but what do I know. This neologism was questioned - so it should probably have valid citations added as a precaution? --Connel MacKenzie 22:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Three citations added. —scs 00:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've heard it used many times by chemists personally, though I don't know that I could easily add more citations. --EncycloPetey 00:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What's more important is if it's only used by chemists, or if it can be used in other areas as well, apparently statistics? DAVilla 06:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you all! Well done, rfd tag removed. --Connel MacKenzie 16:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The term is used in many Science arenas such as Chemistry, Pharmacy etc. where specific and quantifiable amounts of material need to be measured out prior as part of preparation for work (testing) to be carried out on it.--Williamsayers79 21:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFV passed DAVilla 16:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:aliquoting&oldid=31615681"