Talk:celeripedean
Request for verification[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Great dictionary word, but does not seem ever to have caught on. Only use I can find is from a scholar writing in 1927, who uses it in a sentence composed of various classic words from the Glossographia. Even if we accept that as a use (which I would rather not), still need two more. -- Visviva 12:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think we should accept that use. Unfortunately, I can’t access the page that the quotation’s on; could you add it? † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 02:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Enjoy: Citations:celeripedean. I'll grant, if we had two real citations I wouldn't be inclined to stand on principle. But I don't really think this rises above the level of an example sentence in a dictionary (or a weird-words book). -- Visviva
- Wow. Yeah, I can kinda see whatcha mean there. That was pretty heavy going. It reminds me of L. J. D. Richardson’s 1947 humorous essay A Little Classics Is a Dangerous Thing (the entirety of which I managed to copy to a .txt file, comparing two snippets and the text quoted by the search engine), whose topic is the pedant’s zeal but which features numerous mis-pluralisations of (mainly Latinate) words and other such errors. Here’s a representative example:
- Too often you will hear people saying ‘octopuses’ when they should, of course, have said ‘octopi’ : and we fear that to use the forms ‘platypi’ and ‘rhinoceri’ is only to incur the reproach of pedantry. The times are out of joint : we worship at the shrine of universal education, but this ideal is the very antipode of the actual fact. Slipshod and inaccurate utterance pervades every strata of society.
- :-D † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 05:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Wow. Yeah, I can kinda see whatcha mean there. That was pretty heavy going. It reminds me of L. J. D. Richardson’s 1947 humorous essay A Little Classics Is a Dangerous Thing (the entirety of which I managed to copy to a .txt file, comparing two snippets and the text quoted by the search engine), whose topic is the pedant’s zeal but which features numerous mis-pluralisations of (mainly Latinate) words and other such errors. Here’s a representative example:
- BTW, I think that it’s incorrectly defined as we have it; it’s an adjective, not a noun. The noun would be *(deprecated template usage) celeriped or something; there exists a similar word — celeripede — also claiming descent from Latin celeripēs (“swift-footed”), but in its case viâ the French céléripede. † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 05:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
RFV failed, replaced with {{only in|{{in appendix|Words found only in dictionaries}}}}. —RuakhTALK 23:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC)