Talk:emptor
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pious Eterino in topic RFV discussion: July–August 2023
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Is this actually in use in English? I tried looking for "the emptor is", "the emptor should", "emptors are", but could not find anything compelling. PUC – 11:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Some uses: [1], [2], [3]. --Lambiam 15:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- OED actually has 7 cites. Here are some more in the collocations "vendor and emptor" and "vendors and emptors": [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Here's one more: [9]. Upon a cursory look these, OED's cites, and Lambiam's cites are all independent. 蒼鳥 fawk. tell me if i did anything wrong. 01:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- RFV passed, although citations have not been added. Pious Eterino (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)