Talk:fraternal birth order
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BD2412 in topic fraternal birth order
Deletion discussion
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Definition isn't right, and I can't see this as entryworthy. --Type56op9 (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as just totally wrong. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Move to fraternal birth order effect.This is an actual scientific hypothesis, and that's the most common name for it (it gets several pages of hits on Google Books). -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 21:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)- I noticed that we already had the hyphenated form fraternal birth-order effect. I went ahead and created an unhyphenated form (fraternal birth order effect), and converted the hyphenated form to an "alternative form of" entry, since the unhyphenated form gets more hits on Google Books. I'm now fine with deleting the nominated entry (fraternal birth order). -Cloudcuckoolander (talk) 23:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Deleted as the wrong title for the term. bd2412 T 19:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)