because have to que sisnifica
"Because have to" is ungrammatical. One might hear "because I have to" as answer to a question:
"Why are you going home? The party is just getting started." "Because I have to."
Just a passing thought, but does this merit its own entry? I'd want to say that "have" in this sense still functions as an auxiliary verb while "to" functions as a particle preceding an implied verb. 184.108.40.206 01:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)